Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex-M4 vs UNISOC T619 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

ARM Cortex-M4

► remove from comparison

UNISOC T619

► remove from comparison UNISOC T619

Der Unisoc T619 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2,2 GHz Taktrate und 6 kleinen Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Dual-Core-ISP (24, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x mit 1866 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Im Vergleich zum älteren Unisoc T616, werden die A75 Kerne um 200 MHz höher getaktet und die GPU um 100 MHz.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelARM Cortex-M4UNISOC T619UNISOC Tangula T700
Series UNISOC UNISOC
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
UNISOC T619 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (850 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T619 +
403 Points (16%)
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T619 +
1489 Points (3%)
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T619 +
46931 Points (39%)
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T619 +
76849 Points (62%)
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T619 +
32843 Points (6%)
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T619 +
78585 Points (28%)
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T619 +
235208 Points (23%)
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T619 +
273781 Points (17%)
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T619 +
76619 Points (21%)
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T619 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 23:00:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15071 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731794443s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15071 +0s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 15071 +0s ... 0.009s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#13 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.029s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.029s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)