Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz vs Samsung Exynos W920 vs ARM Cortex-M4

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

Der Samsung Exynos W920 ist ein Dual-Core ARM SoC für IoT (Internet of Things) Devices aus 2021. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,18 GHz und wird im modernen 5nm Prozess gefertigt. Er integriert eine ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, ein LTE Cat.4 150Mbps Download / Cat.5 75 Mbps Upload Modem und Unterstützung für eMMC 16GB und LPDDR4 12 GB. Videos können mit Full HD und 30fps aufgenommen werden und in HEVC (H.265), H.264 und VP8 en- und dekodiert werden.

ARM Cortex-M4

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHzSamsung Exynos W920ARM Cortex-M4
Series Samsung
Serie:
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Rockchip RK3566 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W9301.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W920 « 1.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1200 MHz1180 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameARM Cortex-A55
Technology5 nm
FeaturesMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps video
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
12 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 07. 11:35:27

#0 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720344927 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Jul 2024 05:15:11 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#8 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#12 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.044s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)