Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core m3-7Y30

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core m3-7Y30

Intel m3-7Y30

Der Intel Core m3-7Y30 ist ein extrem sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Tablets und passiv gekühlte Notebooks, der auf der Kaby-Lake-Architektur basiert und Ende August 2016 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU integriert 2 Prozessorkerne, die mit 1,0 bis 2,6 GHz takten (2-Kern-Turbo noch unbekannt). Dank Hyper-Threading kann der Prozessor vier Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine Intel HD Graphics 615 Grafikkarte, einen Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder. Die Fertigung erfolgt weiterhin in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren.

Architektur

Im Vergleich mit Skylake hat Intel die zugrundeliegende Mikroarchitektur praktisch unverändert übernommen, sodass sich keine Unterschiede in der Pro-MHz-Leistung ergeben. Überarbeitet wurde lediglich die Speed-Shift-Technik zur schnelleren dynamischen Anpassung von Spannungen und Taktraten, zudem gestattet der gereifte 14-Nanometer-Prozess deutlich höhere Frequenzen und eine bessere Energieeffizienz als bislang.

Performance

Nachdem Intel die Core-m5- und Core-m7-Serie abgeschafft beziehungsweise in die höhere i5- und i7-Reihe eingegliedert hat, stellt der m3-7Y30 formal den einzigen verbleibenden Vertreter der Core-m-Baureihe dar. Durch seinen hohen Turbo-Takt kann der 7Y30 zwar bei kurzzeitigen Lastspitzen und Single-Thread-Anwendungen gelegentlich mit Modellen der 15-Watt-Serie mithalten, wird bei Dauerbelastung jedoch merkliche Takt- und Leistungseinbrüche zeigen. Dennoch ist die CPU für viele anspruchsvollere Anwendungen sowie Multitasking geeignet. Dank der besseren Energieeffizienz schlägt die CPU in vielen Fällen sogar die Core-m5- und Core-m7-Ableger der Skylake-Generation.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel HD Graphics 615 Grafikkarte verfügt wie die alte HD Graphics 515 über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs) und taktet in diesem Fall mit 300 bis 900 MHz. Die Performance hängt stark von der eingestellten TDP sowie dem verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem LPDDR3-1866 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb und angehobener Leistungsaufnahme dürfte die GPU gelegentlich an die Leistung der HD Graphics 520 herankommen, kann in anderen Fällen aber auch deutlich langsamer sein. Aktuelle Spiele des Jahres 2016 werden, wenn überhaupt, nur in niedrigsten Einstellungen flüssig dargestellt.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt in einem weiter verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren, wodurch die Energieeffizienz nochmals spürbar gestiegen ist. Die TDP wird, typisch für die Y-Serie, standardmäßig mit 4,5 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck nach oben oder unten variiert werden.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core m3-7Y30
CodenameJasper LakeKaby Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Kaby Lake
Serie: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 « 1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1000 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
2 / 4
TDP15 Watt4.5 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
max. Temp.100 °C
$281 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 226     avg: 244.7     median: 250 (2%)     max: 258 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 103     avg: 105.3     median: 105 (29%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 2.67     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (4%)     max: 2.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (29%)     max: 1.24 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 4071     avg: 4086     median: 4086 (25%)     max: 4101 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 8431     avg: 8639     median: 8638.5 (6%)     max: 8846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 9764     avg: 10514     median: 10514 (7%)     max: 11264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 5253     avg: 5270     median: 5269.5 (6%)     max: 5286 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
692 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
20.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
1255 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
15.6 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
85.3 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
0.3 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
1.5 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
1809 Seconds (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 3405     avg: 3407     median: 3406.5 (7%)     max: 3408 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
14.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
33.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
719 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 3611     avg: 3616     median: 3615.5 (9%)     max: 3620 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
31762 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 29788     avg: 30303     median: 30302.5 (25%)     max: 30817 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 33164     avg: 33771     median: 33229 (28%)     max: 34920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 2550     avg: 2691     median: 2744 (7%)     max: 2779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 3727     avg: 3847     median: 3866 (7%)     max: 3949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 1138     avg: 1304     median: 1304 (5%)     max: 1470 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
5006 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
2538 Points (50%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
5526 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
2538 Points (38%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 1414     avg: 1421     median: 1421 (2%)     max: 1428 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 23605     avg: 24813     median: 24813 (21%)     max: 26021 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
16.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
15.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
15.9 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-7Y30 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 03. 01:25:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8163 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733185523s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8163 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 8163 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.03s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)