Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i7-7820HK

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i7-7820HK

Intel i7-7820HK

Der Intel Core i7-7820HK ist ein schneller Quad-Core-Prozessor für Notebooks auf Basis der Kaby-Lake-Architektur, der im Jänner 2017 vorgestellt wurde. Zum Zeitpunkt der Präsentation ist er das zweitschnellste Modell seiner Baureihe. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen inklusive Hyper-Threading-Support, die mit 2,9 bis 3,9 GHz takten (4 Kerne: max. 3,5 GHz, 2 Kerne: max. 3,5 GHz), integriert der Prozessor auch eine HD Graphics 630 Grafikeinheit sowie einen Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133). Die Fertigung erfolgt in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren.

Der i7-7820HK ist technisch identisch zum Core i7-7820HQ jedoch ohne Unterstützung der Business-Features vPro und TXT.

Architektur

Im Vergleich mit Skylake hat Intel die zugrundeliegende Mikroarchitektur praktisch unverändert übernommen, sodass sich keine Unterschiede in der Pro-MHz-Leistung ergeben. Überarbeitet wurde lediglich die Speed-Shift-Technik zur schnelleren dynamischen Anpassung von Spannungen und Taktraten, zudem gestattet der gereifte 14-Nanometer-Prozess deutlich höhere Frequenzen und eine bessere Energieeffizienz als bislang.

Performance

Durch die hohen Taktraten schlägt der 7820HK auch das Skylake Spitzenmodell i7-6920HQ (2,9 - 3,8)  der Skylake Generation knapp. Der schnellere i7-7920HQ der selben Generation bietet noch einmal 200 MHz mehr Takt, ist jedoch auch deutlich teurer. Dadurch reicht die Leistung auch für sehr anspruchsvolle Aufgaben.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel HD Graphics 630 Grafikkarte verfügt wie die alte HD Graphics 530 über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs) und taktet in diesem Fall mit 350 - 1100 MHz. Die Performance hängt stark vom verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem DDR4-2133 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb sollte die Leistung mit einer dedizerten Nvidia GeForce 920M vergleichbar sein.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren. Die Anfang Jänner eingeführten Dual-Core-Kaby-Lake-Prozessoren sollten außerdem schon HDCP 2.2 beherrschen.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt in einem weiter verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren, wodurch die Energieeffizienz nochmals spürbar gestiegen ist. Die TDP wird mit 45 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck auch auf 35 Watt abgesenkt werden vom Notebookhersteeller (cTDP Down). Dadurch verringert sich jedoch auch die Durchschnittliche Leistung, da der Turbo nicht so lange gehalten wird.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i7-7820HK
CodenameJasper LakeKaby Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Kaby Lake
Serie: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK « 2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2900 - 3900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
max. Temp.100 °C
$378 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 689     avg: 773     median: 770 (5%)     max: 867 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 156     avg: 162.7     median: 162 (46%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 8.34     avg: 8.6     median: 8.4 (11%)     max: 9.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (44%)     max: 1.85 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6062     avg: 6231     median: 6182 (37%)     max: 6566 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 22793     avg: 23622     median: 23046.5 (17%)     max: 26081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 32769     avg: 34129.5     median: 34129.5 (22%)     max: 35490 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8465     avg: 8558.5     median: 8558.5 (10%)     max: 8652 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.4     avg: 234.7     median: 214.3 (3%)     max: 330.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.668     avg: 10.4     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 17.8 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
215.4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5114     avg: 5135     median: 5134.5 (8%)     max: 5155 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 46     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (16%)     max: 47.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 177     avg: 178.8     median: 178.8 (41%)     max: 180.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.416     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.609 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.71     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.831 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (11%)     max: 4.3 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7957     avg: 8098     median: 8038 (17%)     max: 8360 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (2%)     max: 10.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.67     avg: 21.7     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 490.5     avg: 529     median: 535 (2%)     max: 550 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30280 Points (23%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9542     avg: 10034     median: 10019 (25%)     max: 10523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51307     avg: 53563     median: 52699.5 (43%)     max: 59600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50796     avg: 53623     median: 52515.5 (43%)     max: 59482 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 51327     avg: 54058     median: 52784.5 (44%)     max: 60127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7905     avg: 8141     median: 8001.5 (20%)     max: 9050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11041     avg: 11381     median: 11174 (20%)     max: 12592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4259     avg: 4439     median: 4447 (19%)     max: 4568 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4841     avg: 4897     median: 4896.5 (49%)     max: 4952 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15838     avg: 16002     median: 16001.5 (16%)     max: 16165 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4867     avg: 4905     median: 4904.5 (67%)     max: 4942 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15042     avg: 15309     median: 15308.5 (37%)     max: 15575 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14323     avg: 15088     median: 14476 (26%)     max: 16465 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3718     avg: 4002     median: 3926 (77%)     max: 4361 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14990 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3885 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 901     avg: 2277     median: 984 (1%)     max: 7545 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 68.3     avg: 138.2     median: 71.1 (1%)     max: 400.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35189     avg: 38766     median: 39000 (33%)     max: 40652 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7820HK → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 03. 20:43:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8415 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733255026s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8415 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 8415 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.021s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.021s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.025s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.03s

#16 return log +0.002s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)