Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i7-1195G7

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i7-1195G7

Intel i7-1195G7

Der Intel Core i7-1195G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert Mitte 2021 als Refresh vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der Basistakt liegt zwischen 1,3 GHz (12 Watt TDP) bis 3,9 GHz (28 Watt TDP). Der Turbo kann bis zu 5 GHz erreichen (einzelner Kern mit Turbo Boost 3.0). Alle Kerne können maximal 4,6 GHz erreichen. Zum Zeitpunkt der Vorstellung ist der i7-1195G7 das schnellste Tiger-Lake-Modell. 

Die integrierte Intel Iris Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) bietet alle 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1400 MHz.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6E) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.

Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden (mit unterschiedlichem Basistakt) und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i7-1195G7
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameJasper LakeTiger Lake-UP3
Serie: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 « 2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2900 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache320 KB
max. Temp.100 °C
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1195G7
33 pt (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
89 Points (51%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
307 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3142     avg: 5022     median: 5337 (5%)     max: 6806 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1290     avg: 1457     median: 1455 (62%)     max: 1624 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 498     avg: 563     median: 559 (62%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1212     avg: 1907     median: 1932 (5%)     max: 2590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 574     avg: 853     median: 940 (6%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 198     avg: 221.4     median: 222 (64%)     max: 238 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40873 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12384 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
281.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6334 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17053     avg: 23469     median: 24669 (14%)     max: 26183 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5059     avg: 5409     median: 5386 (64%)     max: 5890 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.23     avg: 6.5     median: 6.6 (12%)     max: 8.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
6.4 GB/s (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1058     avg: 1105     median: 1105 (14%)     max: 1152 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 473     avg: 691     median: 597.5 (4%)     max: 1211 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.53     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.611 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9989 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
354.2 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6684     avg: 10304     median: 10438.5 (28%)     max: 13153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 63087     avg: 67596     median: 67595.5 (55%)     max: 72104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64343     avg: 67940     median: 67939.5 (55%)     max: 71536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65247     avg: 71962     median: 71962 (61%)     max: 78677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5428     avg: 8477     median: 8745 (22%)     max: 10705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7982     avg: 12497     median: 13225 (24%)     max: 15514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2687     avg: 4165     median: 4266 (18%)     max: 5913 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 2064     median: 2064 (55%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7596     avg: 7644     median: 7644 (30%)     max: 7692 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1519     avg: 1569     median: 1536 (61%)     max: 1649 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4241     avg: 4940     median: 4734 (8%)     max: 6349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1575     avg: 1606     median: 1605.5 (7%)     max: 1636 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4683     avg: 5066     median: 5066 (16%)     max: 5449 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6818     avg: 6894     median: 6894 (69%)     max: 6970 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18904     avg: 20630     median: 20629.5 (23%)     max: 22355 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 594     avg: 664     median: 612 (1%)     max: 1047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
118.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
69945 Points (61%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 195     avg: 255     median: 261 (54%)     max: 271 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1341     avg: 1412     median: 1435 (55%)     max: 1460 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.6     avg: 40.8     median: 36.7 (6%)     max: 65.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.4     avg: 46     median: 49.3 (9%)     max: 66 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.32     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (4%)     max: 4.34 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.1     avg: 21.6     median: 20 (15%)     max: 35.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1195G7 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 08:14:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728972864s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:17:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.002s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.026s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)