Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i5-8265U

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i5-8265U

Der Intel Core i5-8265U ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Whiskey-Lake-Architektur basiert und wahrscheinlich im Q3 2018 vorgestellt wird (IFA als möglicher Termin). Im Vergleich zur Kaby-Lake-Refresh Generation, gibt es bei Whiskey-Lake anscheinend keine Unterschiede bis auf den verbesserten 14nm Prozess (14nm++ versus 14nm+). Verglichen mit dem Kaby-Lake-R Core i5-8250U, bietet der i5-8265U einen deutlich höheren Turbo-Boost-Takt. 3,9 GHz versus 3,4 GHz mit einem einzelnen Kern (3,8 GHz mit 2 Kernen, 3,7 bei Benutzung aller 4 Kerne). Ausserdem nutzt Whiskey Lake einen neuen PCH in 14nm mit USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) und CNVi WLAN/Bluetooth.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört weiterhin auf den Namen Intel UHD Graphics 620, unterscheidet sich jedoch nicht von der Intel HD Graphics 620. Im Core i7-8565U taktet sie von 300 - 1100 MHz. Weiters bietet die CPU noch einen integrierten DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder.

Architektur

Whiskey-Lake nutzt die selbe Architektur wie Kaby-Lake, welche wiederum sehr ähnlich zur Skylake Architektur ist. Dadurch hat sich die Pro-MHz-Leistung kaum verändert. Nur der gereifte 14nm Prozess verhilft zur schnelleren Taktraten und effizienterer Performance.

Performance

Die Leistung des i5-8265U hängt stark vom konfigurierten TDP, wie lange der Boost laufen darf und von der Kühlung ab. Dadurch kann es zu einer hohen Schwankungsbreite kommen. Bereits beim i7-8550U gab es sehr große Leistungsunterschiede, vor allem bei längerer Last. Wie beim Core i7-8565U ist von einer Mehrleistung von maximal 10% im Vergleich zum Core i5-8250U auszugehen.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics 620 ist laut Intel identisch zur Intel HD Graphics 620 (z.B. im Core i5-7200U). Sie verfügt wie die alte HD Graphics 520 über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs). Die Performance hängt stark vom verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem DDR4-2133 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb kann sie sich mit einer dedizerten Nvidia GeForce 920M messen.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake und Whiskey Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt erneut verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess (14nm++) mit FinFET-Transistoren. Der TDP ist weiterhin ULV-typisch mit 15 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck zwischen 7,5 und 25 Watt variiert werden.

Achtung: Diese Informationen basieren noch auf Leaks und Gerüchten und können sich bis zum Release in Q3 2018 noch ändern.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i5-8265U
CodenameJasper LakeWhiskey Lake-U
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core i5
Serie: Core i5 Whiskey Lake-U
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8365U compare1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U « 1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1600 - 3900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8265U
26.4 pt (44%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1008 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 325     avg: 389.2     median: 397 (44%)     max: 403 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 972     avg: 1271     median: 1285.5 (3%)     max: 1564 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 457     avg: 592     median: 601.5 (4%)     max: 750 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 111     avg: 155     median: 159 (45%)     max: 164 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.22     avg: 6     median: 5.7 (7%)     max: 7.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.73     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.88 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5841     avg: 6044     median: 6082 (37%)     max: 6209 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16318     avg: 18952     median: 19418 (14%)     max: 22962 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 18924     avg: 21959     median: 21775.5 (14%)     max: 25361 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7705     avg: 7880     median: 7919 (10%)     max: 7975 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 371.4     avg: 402.4     median: 402.4 (5%)     max: 433.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 9.635     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3215     avg: 4040     median: 3988 (6%)     max: 4916 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 13731     avg: 16360     median: 16245 (9%)     max: 18802 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3780     avg: 4054     median: 4084 (48%)     max: 4195 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 31.9     avg: 37.2     median: 39.1 (13%)     max: 40.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 150.5     avg: 158.7     median: 156 (36%)     max: 169.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.427     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (14%)     max: 0.464 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.708     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.789 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1565 Seconds (20%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.72     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.754 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5637     avg: 6330     median: 6316 (13%)     max: 7439 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9.762     avg: 10     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.32 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22.12     avg: 22.3     median: 22.2 (1%)     max: 22.43 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 543     avg: 562     median: 552 (2%)     max: 590 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4154     avg: 6319     median: 6222 (16%)     max: 8443 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21036     avg: 38716     median: 38144 (31%)     max: 50513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 21037     avg: 37535     median: 36912 (30%)     max: 48588 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 23095     avg: 49269     median: 52630 (44%)     max: 56737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3393     avg: 5794     median: 5651 (14%)     max: 8298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4640     avg: 7934     median: 8001 (14%)     max: 11278 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1837     avg: 2540     median: 2657 (11%)     max: 2931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1024     avg: 1039     median: 1041.5 (41%)     max: 1047 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3442     avg: 3669     median: 3624.5 (6%)     max: 3986 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 986     avg: 1015     median: 1017 (4%)     max: 1041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2973     avg: 3446     median: 3365 (11%)     max: 3962 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 4387     median: 4514 (45%)     max: 4830 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7144     avg: 13600     median: 13295 (13%)     max: 16249 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4229     avg: 4422     median: 4433 (60%)     max: 4605 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13168     avg: 13975     median: 14368 (35%)     max: 14390 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12198     avg: 13659     median: 14002 (25%)     max: 14499 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3470     avg: 3669     median: 3678.5 (72%)     max: 3842 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12221     avg: 13021     median: 13021 (20%)     max: 13821 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3805     avg: 3906     median: 3906 (58%)     max: 4007 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10592     avg: 10596     median: 10595.5 (85%)     max: 10599 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 8582     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (79%)     max: 8738 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11914     avg: 12181     median: 12181 (24%)     max: 12448 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 12671     avg: 13099     median: 13099 (26%)     max: 13527 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 11598     avg: 11639     median: 11639 (30%)     max: 11680 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 851     avg: 1141     median: 1194 (1%)     max: 1245 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 83     avg: 93.5     median: 95.6 (1%)     max: 99.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12842     avg: 31246     median: 32120 (27%)     max: 35563 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
145.3 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 186     avg: 187     median: 187 (34%)     max: 188 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1006 Points (39%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8265U → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 24. 17:19:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10116 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735057154s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10116 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 10116 +0.051s ... 0.063s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.102s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.105s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)