Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i3-N305

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

Der Intel Processor N200 ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit 1 GHz bis zu 3,7 GHz (3,2 GHz Multi-Core-Turbo). Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Der i3 bietet keinerlei vPro Management Features.

Performance

Die Performance des N200 ist durch die Halbierung der Kerne deutlich schwächer als beim i3-N305. Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N eingeschränkt. Theoretisch sollte sich die Performance etwas unterhalb eines alten Core i5-8250U befinden (4 Kerne mit Hyperthreading, max 3,4 GHz, 15W).

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Diese sind alle im N200 aktiviert und takten von 450 - 750 MHz relativ gering. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl, Taktung und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der N200 ist nur mit 6 Watt (PL1) TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher auch für lüfterlose Systeme. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

Der Intel Core i3-N305 ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit bis zu 3,8 GHz (3 GHz Multi-Core-Turbo). Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Der i3 bietet keinerlei vPro Management Features.

Performance

Die Performance des i3 ist stark abhängig von der Kühlung und den TDP Settings. Wenn alle 8 Kerne ausgelastet werden, sollte er eine gute Multi-Thread-Performance bieten (deutlich oberhalb der alten Quad-Core CPUs wie ein i5-8260U. Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N eingeschränkt.

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Diese sind alle im i3-N305 aktiviert und takten bis 1,25 GHz. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der i3-N305 ist mit 15 Watt (PL1) TDP (cTDP-down 9 Watt, dann nur 1 GHz Basistakt) spezifiziert. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Processor N200Intel Core i3-N305
CodenameJasper LakeAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Serie: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
Announced
L1 Cache768 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
65 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
356%
1 i3-N305 +
324 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
362%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
142%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (42%)     max: 380 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
365%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
219 Points (1%)
379%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
113 Points (32%)
146%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
415%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
150%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
347%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
362%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
146%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
160%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
296%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
127%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
343%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (19%)     max: 56.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (18%)
253%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
368%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
184%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
180%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
172%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
345%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
365%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
148%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
233%
1 i3-N305 +
9081 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
106%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
117%
1 i3-N305 +
36.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
133%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
305%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
323%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (23%)     max: 9111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
201%
1 i3-N305 +
55544 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
197%
1 i3-N305 +
56367 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
178%
1 i3-N305 +
61854 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
301%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
281%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
279%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
137%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (33%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
282%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
928 Points (36%)
114%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (41%)     max: 1083 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
299%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
118%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
296%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
102%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
171%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
149%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (47%)     max: 194 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
108%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (34%)     max: 190.4 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
43 MB/s (53%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
374.6 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
150%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (35%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
36.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
161%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
139%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 21:43:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734900197s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.073s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)