Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Celeron N4505

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Celeron N4505

Intel Celeron N4505

Der Intel Celeron N4505 ist ein Anfang 2021 vorgestellter Dual-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Desktops verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 2 bis 2,9 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Jasper-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt im 10nm Prozess bei Intel (wahrscheinlich wie Ice Lake).  Neben den zwei CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit mit 16 EUs und einem Takt von bis zu 750 MHz, sowie einen LPDDR4(x)-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.933 MHz, 16 GB max.). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Weiterhin integriert der Chip teilweise WLAN und kann kostengünstig mit Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) ausgestattet werden. 8 PCIe Gen3 Lanes werden vom SoC nach aussen geführt und 14 USB 2.0/3.2 und 2 SATA 6.0 Anschlüsse können verbaut werden. Das Package des SoCs misst 35 x 24 mm und ist damit deutlich größer als beim Vorgänger (25 x 24 mm).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Jasper Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger deutlich weiterentwickelt. Im Schnitt soll sich die Einzelkernperformance im Vergleich zu Goldmont Plus um 30% erhöhen (10 - 80% bei den SPECint und SPECfp Benchmarks).

Performance

Durch die schnellere Architektur sollte der Celeron N4505 etwas schneller sein als der alte Celeron N4020 Dual Core. Der schnellere Celeron N5100 der Jasper Lake Generation ist durch die zwei zusätzlichen CPU Kerne und die stärkere GPU aber deutlich schneller. Dadurch eignet sich der N4500 nur für anspruchslose Tätigkeiten und wenig Multitasking.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics Grafikeinheit bietet 16 EUs (Gen. 11 Grafikkerne wie Ice Lake) welche mit 450 - 750 MHz getaktet werden. Es werden bis zu 3 Bildschirme mit 4k60 Auflösung unterstützt

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 10 Watt spezifiziert (mobiler N4500 6W). Damit kann der Chip prinzipiell rein passiv gekühlt werden, jedoch sind auch Varianten mit Lüfter möglich.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Celeron N4505
CodenameJasper LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
2 / 2
TDP15 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.2 pt (32%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (26%)     max: 615 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (25%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (30%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10063 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
72.3 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
24182 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (21%)     max: 26045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
894 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (26%)     max: 660 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (5%)     max: 5086 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
353.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24502 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (22%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (21%)     max: 115 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 11:05:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734861942s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.041s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.043s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)