Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Celeron J4115

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Celeron J4115

Intel Celeron J4115

Der Intel Celeron J4115 ist ein Ende 2019 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,8 bis 2,5 GHz (Einzelkern Burst, Mehrkern Burst max. 2,2 GHz) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Refresh-Plattform an. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

Performance

Die CPU-Leistung des Celeron J4115 mit 4 CPU-Kernen und einer Taktrate von 1,8 bis 2,5 GHz dürfte stark vom Kühlsystem abhängen. In Mini-PCs ist die Kühlung meist besser und auch aktiv geregelt (per Lüfter), wodurch der SoC z.b. den schneller getakteten Celeron N4120 für Notebooks abhängen kann. Trotzdem gehört die Leistung zur absoluten Einsteigerklasse in 2020. Der J4115 bewältigt jedoch problemlos die meisten Alltagsanwendungen (Office, Browsing) und ist auch für moderates Multitasking geeignet.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics 600 unterscheidet sich nur durch die verbesserten Displayanschlüsse von der HD Graphics 500.

Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine fortschrittliche Videoeinheit, die auch die hardwarebeschleunigte Wiedergabe von VP9- und H.265-Material (8 Bit Farbtiefe) beherrscht.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 10 Watt spezifiziert und damit deutlich höher als der mobilen Celeron N4120 mit 6 Watt.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Celeron J4115
CodenameJasper LakeGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Serie: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1800 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 4
TDP15 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2087 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7426 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
564 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19.1 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1203 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3683 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.4 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
63.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1472 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
27642 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (16%)     max: 410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 29. 16:11:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735485105s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.031s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.034s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)