Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i5-3439Y

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i5-3439Y

Der Intel Core i5-3439Y ist ein besonders stromsparender ULV-Prozessor (13 Watt TDP) aus dem 1. Quartal 2013, der auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur basiert. Die mit einem "Y" am Ende der Modellbezeichnung gekennzeichnete CPU ist insbesondere für den Einsatz in Tablets und Ultrabooks vorgesehen. Dank Hyperthreading können die 2 Kerne gleichzeitig bis zu 4 Threads bearbeiten. Die Fertigung erfolgt im Gegensatz zum Vorgänger Sandy Bridge, der noch in 32 Nanometer produziert wurde, in einem kleineren 22 Nanometer Prozess mit 3D-Transistoren. Die Taktrate liegt mit nur 1,5 GHz (maximaler Turbo: 2,1 GHz für 2 Kerne, 2,3 GHz für 1 Kern) deutlich unter normalen ULV-Modellen mit 17 Watt TDP. 

Ivy Bridge ist ein Die Shrink der Sandy Bridge Architektur, der nur an wenigen Stellen verbessert wurde. Unter anderem werden nun PCI Express in der neuen Version 3.0 sowie DDR3(L)-1600 unterstützt. Keine Änderungen gab es beim Featureset, welches weiterhin beispielsweise die Verschlüsselungstechnik AES-NI, die Befehlssatzerweiterung AVX sowie Turbo-Boost 2.0 umfasst.

Die Performance des i5-3439Y dürfte im Schnitt nur knapp oberhalb des i3-3217U liegen, da die niedrige TDP nur selten die maximalen Turbo-Stufen erlaubt. Dennoch sollte die Leistung für alle Alltagsanwendungen ausreichen.

Für die Grafikausgabe zeigt sich die im Prozessor integrierte Intel HD Graphics 4000 mit 16 sogenannten Execution Units (EUs) verantwortlich. Mittels Turbo-Modus kann die Ausgangstaktrate von 350 MHz bis auf 850 MHz ansteigen.

Mit einer TDP von nur 13 Watt ist der i5-3439Y nochmals sparsamer als die normalen ULV-Modelle (17 Watt). Zudem lässt sich die TDP auf 10 Watt absenken (cTDP Down), was die Performance jedoch weiter mindert. Damit ist die CPU am besten für Ultrabooks oder Tablets geeignet.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i5-3439Y
CodenameJasper LakeIvy Bridge
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core i5
Serie: Core i5 Ivy Bridge
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3380M compare2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3360M compare2.8 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3340M compare2.7 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3320M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3230M compare2.6 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3210M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3437U compare1.9 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3427U compare1.8 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3337U compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3317U compare1.7 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3439Y « 1.5 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3339Y compare1.5 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1500 - 2300 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
2 / 4
TDP15 Watt13 Watt
Technology10 nm22 nm
SocketBGA1338BGA
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHATurbo Boost 2.0, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, VT-d, Trusted Execution, AES, Intel 64, Anti-Theft, My WiFi, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitorin, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4000 (350 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
max. Temp.105 °C
Announced

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 28. 21:40:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3649 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732826431s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 05:17:41 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3649 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 3649 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.01s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.012s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)