Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron N4000

Der Intel Celeron N4000 ist ein Ende 2017 vorgestellter Dual-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Notebooks verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,1 bis 2,6 GHz (Einzelkern Burst, Mehrkern Burst max 2,5 GHz) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz, max. 8 GB). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Im Vergleich zum Celeron N3350, bietet der N4000 leicht verbesserte CPU Kerne mit 200 MHz höherem Boost Takt, doppeltem L2 Cache, ein kleineres Package, neuere Displayanschlüsse und ein teilweise integriertes WLAN Modul (Wireless-AC9560 mit Companion Module).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

Performance

Die CPU-Leistung des Celeron N4000 mit 2 CPU-Kernen und einer Taktrate von 1,1 bis 2,6 GHz dürfte stark vom Kühlsystem abhängen. Wenn der Boost Takt gehalten werden kann, sollte der N4000 einige Prozent schneller rechnen als der Vorgänger Celeron N3350 (2 Kerne 1,1 - 2,4 GHz, 2 MB L2). Der Core m3-7Y30 bietet eine deutlich höhere Einzelkernperformance und kann auch im Mehrkernbetrieb überzeugen, die stärkeren Gemini Lake SoCs bieten im Gegensatz zum N4000 vier Prozessorkerne und sind dadurch bei Multithread-Benchmarks deutlich schneller. Der N4000 bewältigt jedoch problemlos die meisten Alltagsanwendungen (Office, Browsing), jedoch ist Multitasking nur beschränkt möglich.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics 600 unterscheidet sich nur durch die verbesserten Displayanschlüsse von der HD Graphics 500.

Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine fortschrittliche Videoeinheit, die auch die hardwarebeschleunigte Wiedergabe von VP9- und H.265-Material (8 Bit Farbtiefe) beherrscht.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 6 Watt spezifiziert (SDP 4,8 Watt - Scenario Design Power). Damit kann der Chip prinzipiell rein passiv gekühlt werden, jedoch sind auch Varianten mit Lüfter möglich.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Celeron N4000Intel Celeron N5095A
CodenameGemini LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2600 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
2.31 -84%
8.07 -45%
11.2 -24%
11.2 -24%
12 -18%
13.2 -10%
13.9 -5%
Intel Celeron N4000
14.7
15.2 3%
15.6 6%
15.7 7%
16.2 10%
16.5 12%
16.6 13%
16.7 14%
16.9 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
17 16%
...
47.4 222%
max:
60.1 309%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
160 Points (18%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
273 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2152 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4030 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1007 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.9 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
760 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4114 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2298 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.5 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
47.3 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4736 Seconds (33%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (36%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2259 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
57.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1295 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (17%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
434 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
791 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1862 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3219 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15679 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 28. 09:17:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735373826s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.013s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.045s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)