Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4105 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Celeron J4105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4105

Der Intel Celeron J4105 ist ein Ende 2017 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC für Desktops, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,5 bis 2,5 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Ryzen 3 2200G ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit integrierter Vega Grafikkarte. Der SoC beinhaltet 4 Zen Kerne (Quad-Core CPU, ohne SMT / Hyperthreading) die von 3,5 - 3,7 GHz getaktet werden. Der TDP ist mit 65 Watt spezifiziert. Der L3-Cache beträgt beim 2200G 4 MB. Weiters ist eine Radeon RX Vega 8 getaufte Grafikkarte mit 8 CUs (512 Shader bei maximal 1100 MHz) integriert. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt maximal Dual-Channel DDR4-2933.

Detaillierte Informationen über die Raven Ridge APUs finden sie in unserem Launchartikel.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron J4105AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
CodenameGemini LakeZen
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Serie: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
Intel Celeron J4105 « 1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1500 - 2500 MHz3500 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L3 Cache4 MB
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 2200G
25.5 pt (42%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -91%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
24.7 -3%
Intel Core i5-8250U
24.8 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
24.8 -3%
Intel Processor N95
24.8 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
25 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
25 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
25.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
25.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
25.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
25.5
Intel Core i3-1110G4
25.7 1%
Intel Core i3-1005G1
25.7 1%
Intel Processor N97
25.8 1%
Intel Core i5-8259U
25.9 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
26 2%
Intel Core i3-10110U
26 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
26.2 3%
Intel Core i5-11400T
26.3 3%
Intel Core i5-8265U
26.4 4%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 136%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
363 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1446 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
270 Points (2%)
min: 561     avg: 574     median: 577 (4%)     max: 581 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (21%)
min: 142     avg: 145.8     median: 145.6 (41%)     max: 150 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4625 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16684 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
333 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3229 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
14790 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3948 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
39.7 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
184 fps (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.3 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 825     avg: 826     median: 826 (6%)     max: 827 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6636 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
651 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6549     avg: 6805     median: 6805 (17%)     max: 7061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
71141 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5655 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
7706 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 950     avg: 1087     median: 1086.5 (42%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3391     avg: 4882     median: 4881.5 (9%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
959 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3431 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4148     avg: 4249     median: 4249 (42%)     max: 4350 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11266     avg: 11897     median: 11896.5 (12%)     max: 12527 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4082 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11105 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 954     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
92.7 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34670 Points (29%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
69 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200G → 207% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 23. 20:28:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9928 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9896 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734982115s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9928 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9928 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9896 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 9896 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.03s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)