Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4005 vs unknown vs ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron J4005 ist ein sparsamer 2,0 GHz schneller Dual-Core-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Gemini-Lake-Architektur und wurde Ende 2017 vorgestellt. Viele Features wie, AES, SHA und auch die Turbo Boost Funktionen bietet der kleine Einstiegs SoC. Im Turbo kann der Intel Celeron J4005 mit bis zu 2,7 GHz getaktet werden. Der SoC wird im 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs gefertigt und ist fest im System verbaut.

Die Änderungen im Vergleich zur Vorgängerserie zeigen sich auch beim L2-Cache, welcher nun mit 4 MB statt 2 MB, doppelt so groß ist. Alle neuen Gemini-Lake-SoCs unterstützen DDR4-RAM mit maximal 2.400 MHz (auch Low Power RAM).

Zum Einsatz kommen die neuen SoCs vor allem im Einstiegssegment. So werden günstige Mini-ITX Mainboards und Mini-PCs im zu finden sein, welche die neuen stromsparenden Prozessoren beheimaten. Aber auch om Destktop-Segment wird Intel die aktuellsten NUC mit den heuen SoCs ausstatten.

Mit der Intel UHD Graphics 600 bietet der Prozessor eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Beim Intel Celeron J4005 bietet die Intel UHD Graphics 600 12 EUs und taktet mit 250 MHz bis 700 MHz.

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

unknown

► remove from comparison

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron J4005unknownARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz
SeriesIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini Lake
Serie:
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock2000 - 2700 MHz1200 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
TDP10 Watt
Technology14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86ARM
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
144 Points (1%)
721%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
195%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
566%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
423 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2563 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
325%
1 unknown +
6498 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (4%)
433%
1 unknown +
15112 Points (17%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
12 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (30%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13948 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 18. 20:25:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1729275901s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:17:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 10044 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.002s

#11 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.019s ... 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#13 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.033s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.034s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.038s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.038s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.039s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.039s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.039s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.039s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.04s

#28 return log +0s ... 0.04s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)