Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Celeron J4005 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Celeron J4005 ist ein sparsamer 2,0 GHz schneller Dual-Core-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Gemini-Lake-Architektur und wurde Ende 2017 vorgestellt. Viele Features wie, AES, SHA und auch die Turbo Boost Funktionen bietet der kleine Einstiegs SoC. Im Turbo kann der Intel Celeron J4005 mit bis zu 2,7 GHz getaktet werden. Der SoC wird im 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs gefertigt und ist fest im System verbaut.
Die Änderungen im Vergleich zur Vorgängerserie zeigen sich auch beim L2-Cache, welcher nun mit 4 MB statt 2 MB, doppelt so groß ist. Alle neuen Gemini-Lake-SoCs unterstützen DDR4-RAM mit maximal 2.400 MHz (auch Low Power RAM).
Zum Einsatz kommen die neuen SoCs vor allem im Einstiegssegment. So werden günstige Mini-ITX Mainboards und Mini-PCs im zu finden sein, welche die neuen stromsparenden Prozessoren beheimaten. Aber auch om Destktop-Segment wird Intel die aktuellsten NUC mit den heuen SoCs ausstatten.
Mit der Intel UHD Graphics 600 bietet der Prozessor eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Beim Intel Celeron J4005 bietet die Intel UHD Graphics 600 12 EUs und taktet mit 250 MHz bis 700 MHz.
Architektur
Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.
Intel Core i9-12900H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Im Vergleich zum 12900HK bietet der 12900H keinen freien Multiplikator, aber unterstützt das volle "Enterprise" Feature-Set von vPro (Management Features).
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900H in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine 13% höhere Performance an (1080p high) und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900H sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (115W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Model Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Core i9-12900H Series Intel Gemini Lake Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Gemini Lake Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 2000 - 2700 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 112 KB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 4 MB 11.5 MB Cores / Threads 2 / 2 14 / 20 TDP 10 Watt 45 Watt Technology 14 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 105 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1090 BGA1744 Features DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 $107 U.S. Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com L3 Cache 24 MB
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
...
...
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96 avg: 104.9 median: 106 (60%) max: 112 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 88% 96% 97% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371 avg: 636 median: 578 (11%) max: 920 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 54% 63% 79% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359 avg: 15133 median: 15946.5 (15%) max: 19648 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 64% 67% 56% 77% 78% 83% 72% 81% 84% 85% 81% 100% 96% 87% 92% 84%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634 avg: 1829 median: 1863.5 (79%) max: 1930 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 91% 92% 95% 97% 99% 100% 95% 99% 99% 89% 97% 88% 98% 99% 96% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624 avg: 706 median: 714.5 (79%) max: 738 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 91% 93% 95% 97% 100% 96% 94% 99% 100% 92% 97% 98% 100% 100% 99% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2681 avg: 5717 median: 6056.5 (15%) max: 7471 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 65% 61% 57% 77% 73% 84% 72% 82% 86% 81% 81% 100% 96% 87% 83% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
144 Points (1%)
min: 1395 avg: 2454 median: 2576.5 (16%) max: 3077 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 61% 76% 70% 77% 92% 80% 77% 80% 85% 87% 85% 99% 96% 90% 100% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (22%)
min: 235 avg: 262.3 median: 266 (75%) max: 277 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 83% 90% 91% 96% 100% 99% 93% 98% 100% 92% 95% 98% 100% 99% 100% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
min: 12.08 avg: 23.6 median: 25.3 (33%) max: 32.77 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 47% 64% 78% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (20%)
min: 2.83 avg: 3 median: 3 (71%) max: 3.3 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 72% 91% 92% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (13%)
min: 7952 avg: 8475 median: 8235 (50%) max: 9498 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 70% 84% 92% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (3%)
min: 24313 avg: 43425 median: 47767 (35%) max: 60567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 48% 59% 79% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
min: 48178 avg: 66910 median: 70976.5 (45%) max: 77409 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 66% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (4%)
min: 12846 avg: 13385 median: 13227.5 (16%) max: 14567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 76% 96% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
min: 187.176 avg: 206.8 median: 197.8 (2%) max: 265.116 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 103% 103%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
min: 3.421 avg: 4.1 median: 4 (1%) max: 5.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 102% 102%
798 Points (1%)
min: 7620 avg: 8202 median: 7937 (13%) max: 9328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 65% 85% 90% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 34684 avg: 60849 median: 64908.5 (37%) max: 76677 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 70% 70% 63% 77% 86% 88% 77% 87% 90% 93% 88% 88% 100% 88% 95% 95%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302 avg: 5843 median: 5881 (69%) max: 6289 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 92% 89% 95% 95% 98% 93% 92% 90% 95% 94% 100% 96% 100% 97% 96% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
min: 67.5 avg: 105.8 median: 111.4 (37%) max: 126.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 60% 73% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
min: 225 avg: 266.6 median: 263.3 (61%) max: 317 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 65% 87% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
min: 8.05 avg: 17.1 median: 17.8 (31%) max: 22.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 57% 61% 56% 75% 79% 82% 73% 86% 89% 88% 87% 97% 94% 88% 100% 94%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.864 avg: 1.1 median: 1 (29%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 52% 79% 79% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 1.5 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (33%) max: 2.1 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 65% 93% 100% 83%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
min: 8.6 avg: 10.5 median: 10.3 (27%) max: 12.8 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 58% 90% 100% 78%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273 avg: 420.7 median: 376 (5%) max: 850 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 102% 100% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103% 104% 104% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
min: 160 avg: 231.3 median: 205.5 (1%) max: 451 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 105% 104% 104% 104% 104%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (10%) max: 0.506 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10122 avg: 13153 median: 13453 (29%) max: 14655 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 83% 97% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
min: 7.3 avg: 7.7 median: 7.5 (2%) max: 8.329 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
min: 16.373 avg: 17.3 median: 17.2 (1%) max: 18.439 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
min: 385.4 avg: 410.8 median: 398.6 (2%) max: 474.148 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33640 avg: 52620 median: 53621 (41%) max: 62706 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 77% 89% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
min: 10552 avg: 21276 median: 22264 (56%) max: 26126 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 70% 90% 69% 79% 100% 91% 81% 100% 94% 91% 93% 88% 88% 82% 96% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (15%)
min: 70655 avg: 87893 median: 91477 (74%) max: 103016 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 65% 77% 92% 95% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (15%)
min: 71651 avg: 89380 median: 91745 (74%) max: 103757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 63% 84% 92% 93% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
min: 81857 avg: 89973 median: 89999 (75%) max: 100472 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W 67% 89% 94% 87% 91% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
min: 9262 avg: 17875 median: 18691.5 (47%) max: 22123 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 59% 76% 74% 87% 85% 82% 93% 97% 91% 94% 99% 100% 82% 97% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
min: 9703 avg: 25492 median: 26678.5 (48%) max: 31176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 67% 88% 71% 86% 95% 83% 82% 100% 92% 86% 31% 98% 96% 85% 89% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5062 avg: 11544 median: 12039 (51%) max: 14424 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 69% 86% 67% 80% 100% 87% 75% 92% 94% 87% 91% 88% 97% 83% 87% 92%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 1893 avg: 2375 median: 2464 (63%) max: 2652 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 81% 94% 92% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 9258 avg: 10604 median: 10233 (40%) max: 12649 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 76% 80% 92% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631 avg: 1800 median: 1820 (71%) max: 1897 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 92% 95% 94% 95% 100% 100% 93% 98% 96% 96% 97% 91% 99% 98% 97% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519 avg: 11913 median: 12237 (22%) max: 14376 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 74% 86% 69% 80% 96% 86% 83% 91% 89% 95% 89% 80% 100% 86% 96% 97%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553 avg: 1695 median: 1710 (7%) max: 1838 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 98 W 93% 97% 95% 92% 100% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374 avg: 10525 median: 9892 (31%) max: 12717 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 98 W 73% 96% 77% 88% 100% 89%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
min: 7191 avg: 7533 median: 7650 (76%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 80% 100% 97%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (3%)
min: 30682 avg: 36787 median: 36900 (37%) max: 41134 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 66% 92% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 508 (1%) max: 608 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027 avg: 87439 median: 86645 (72%) max: 92438 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 94% 91% 100% 93%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239 avg: 262 median: 264 (74%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 140 W 89% 96% 95% 92% 97% 88% 100% 95% 98% 92% 98%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263 avg: 297.3 median: 296 (54%) max: 332 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 87% 92% 88% 87% 93% 89% 89% 100% 89% 92% 88% 86% 95% 84% 91% 89%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515 avg: 1846 median: 1872 (72%) max: 2108 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 79% 85% 88% 86% 100% 91% 87% 94% 85% 89% 80% 90% 97% 93%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52 avg: 109.2 median: 101.2 (17%) max: 180 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 118% 127% 125% 112% 117% 106% 121% 114% 105% 110% 109% 100% 106% 116% 107% 103%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.6 avg: 126.3 median: 124 (23%) max: 222 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 134% 137% 142% 129% 137% 129% 141% 127% 128% 127% 130% 100% 119% 132% 120% 120%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05 avg: 29.1 median: 27 (18%) max: 96.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 134% 115% 111% 125% 142% 135% 120% 107% 119%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99 avg: 18.1 median: 14.8 (16%) max: 34.3 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 125% 119% 104%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6 avg: 19.9 median: 19.1 (14%) max: 27.5 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 63% 85% 91% 68% 100% 69% 87% 66% 73% 77% 50% 69% 86% 79% 64%
Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 100% n=29 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 921% n=29
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 13. 02:29:03
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731461343s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#8 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.004s ... 0.009s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.004s ... 0.014s
#10 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.043s ... 0.056s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.119s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.121s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte