Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Celeron J4005

Der Intel Celeron J4005 ist ein sparsamer 2,0 GHz schneller Dual-Core-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Gemini-Lake-Architektur und wurde Ende 2017 vorgestellt. Viele Features wie, AES, SHA und auch die Turbo Boost Funktionen bietet der kleine Einstiegs SoC. Im Turbo kann der Intel Celeron J4005 mit bis zu 2,7 GHz getaktet werden. Der SoC wird im 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs gefertigt und ist fest im System verbaut.

Die Änderungen im Vergleich zur Vorgängerserie zeigen sich auch beim L2-Cache, welcher nun mit 4 MB statt 2 MB, doppelt so groß ist. Alle neuen Gemini-Lake-SoCs unterstützen DDR4-RAM mit maximal 2.400 MHz (auch Low Power RAM).

Zum Einsatz kommen die neuen SoCs vor allem im Einstiegssegment. So werden günstige Mini-ITX Mainboards und Mini-PCs im zu finden sein, welche die neuen stromsparenden Prozessoren beheimaten. Aber auch om Destktop-Segment wird Intel die aktuellsten NUC mit den heuen SoCs ausstatten.

Mit der Intel UHD Graphics 600 bietet der Prozessor eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Beim Intel Celeron J4005 bietet die Intel UHD Graphics 600 12 EUs und taktet mit 250 MHz bis 700 MHz.

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Celeron J4005Intel Celeron N5095A
CodenameGemini LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2700 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP10 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
144 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 29. 16:57:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735487861s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.023s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.026s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)