Notebookcheck Logo

CSR8670 vs Intel Core i5-9400F vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

CSR8670

► remove from comparison

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

Der Intel Core i5-9400F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit sechs Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,9-4,1 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 6 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-9400F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-8400 konnte die Leistung nur leicht gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um bis zu 10 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit nur auf kleinen Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt. Aber auch Spiele zählen zu den Anwendungsgebieten, denn in Spielen schlägt der Intel Core i5-9400F den Intel Core i3-9100F deutlich. Hier zahlen sich die sechs Kerne inzwischen aus. 

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i5-9400F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i5-9400 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

show full text
ModelCSR8670Intel Core i5-9400FHiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
Series Intel Coffee Lake
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 « 0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock80 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads26 / 64 / 4
Announced
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache9 MB
TDP65 Watt
Technology14 nm40 nm
Voltage100 V
Die Size149 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationARMv7
Architecturex86ARM
$182 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -92%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
28.3 -1%
Intel Core i5-10200H
28.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
28.4 -1%
Intel Core i7-8665U
28.4 -1%
Intel Core i7-10810U
28.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
28.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-10610U
28.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
28.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-10510U
28.6 0%
Intel Core i5-9400F
28.7
Intel Core i7-8750H
28.7 0%
Intel Core i7-4790K
28.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
28.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
28.9 1%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
29.1 1%
Intel Core i3-1115G4
29.1 1%
Intel Core i7-10710U
29.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
29.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
29.3 2%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 109%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (49%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
26477 ms (31%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (39%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 13. 10:56:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731491815s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#11 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.001s ... 0.044s

#13 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.081s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)