CSR8670 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs ARM Cortex-M4

CSR8670

► remove from comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Ryzen 5 7600 ist ein sparsamer Ryzen 5 Desktop Prozessor und gehört zur aktuellen Raphael-Serie. Der Ryzen 5 7600 besitzt 6 Kerne und bietet dank SMT insgesamt 12 Threads.

Der Ryzen 5 7600 taktet mit 3,8 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,1GHz auf einem Kern.

Die neuen Zen4-Prozessoren werden alle im 4 nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was die hohen Taktfrequenzen ermöglicht. Den Chiplet-Aufbau gibt es weiterhin, was bedeutet, dass unter dem Heatspreader zusätzlich der I/O-Die seinen Platz hat. Dieser wird hingegen nicht mehr in 12 nm produziert, sondern im kleineren 6 nm Verfahren. Zudem gibt es eine kleine iGPU welche jedoch nur für die 2D-Darstellung geeignet ist.

Im Vergleich zu schneller getakteten R5 7600X, ist der 7600 etwas langsamer aber auch sparsamer mit 65 Watt TDP.

ARM Cortex-M4

► remove from comparison

Model

CSR8670

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

ARM Cortex-M4

Series

AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)

Serie:

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670 «	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D	4.2 - 5.7 GHz	16 / 32	128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X	4.7 - 5.6 GHz	12 / 24	64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900	3.7 - 5.4 GHz	12 / 24	64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X	4.5 - 5.4 GHz	8 / 16	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700	3.8 - 5.3 GHz	8 / 16	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D	4.2 - 5 GHz	8 / 16	96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X	4.7 - 5.3 GHz	6 / 12	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 «	3.8 - 5.1 GHz	6 / 12	32 MB L3

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4 «
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

Clock

80 MHz

3800 - 5100 MHz

Cores / Threads

2

6 / 12

Announced

Codename

Raphael (Zen4)

L1 Cache

384 KB

L2 Cache

6 MB

L3 Cache

32 MB

TDP

65 Watt

Transistors

CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million

Technology

5 nm

Voltage

0.650 - 1.475V V

Die Size

1x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm²

max. Temp.

95 °C

Socket

AM5 (LGA 1718)

Features

MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2

iGPU

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Architecture

x86

Manufacturer

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7600

42.2 pt (70%)

2.31 -95%

...

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

41 -3%

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

41 -3%

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

41 -3%

Intel Core i7-13700HX

41.1 -3%

Intel Core i7-12700

41.2 -2%

Intel Core i7-12700K

41.2 -2%

Intel Core i7-13800H

41.5 -2%

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

41.8 -1%

Intel Core i9-12900HX

42 0%

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

42.2

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

42.3 0%

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

42.3 0%

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

42.6 1%

Intel Core i7-13700

42.8 1%

Intel Core i5-13600K

42.9 2%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

43 2%

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

43.1 2%

Intel Core i7-14650HX

43.2 2%

Intel Core i9-12900K

43.7 4%

...

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

60.1 42%

0%

100%

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core

100%

12735 Points (12%)

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core

100%

1852 Points (79%)

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

100%

724 Points (80%)

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

100%

5487 Points (13%)

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

2339 Points (15%)

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

298 Points (84%)

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

26.4 Points (34%)

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

3.5 Points (83%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

100%

8122 Points (49%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

100%

46166 Points (33%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

100%

83.8 s (1%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

100%

3.1 s (1%)

WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0

100%

14038 Points (22%)

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs

100%

64613 MIPS (37%)

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs

100%

7566 MIPS (89%)

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2

100%

137.8 fps (46%)

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1

100%

347 fps (80%)

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset

100%

19.5 fps (34%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent

100%

1.1 GB/s (32%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish

100%

1.6 GB/s (28%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES

100%

12.5 GB/s (33%)

Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *

100%

352 Seconds (4%)

Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *

100%

219 Seconds (2%)

R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *

100%

0.4 sec (9%)

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

100%

15993 Points (34%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

100%

6.8 s (1%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

100%

14.8 s (1%)

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

100%

351 s (2%)

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics

100%

23854 Points (60%)

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU

100%

9819 Points (41%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

2088 Points (82%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

11095 Points (20%)

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

2005 Points (9%)

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

10745 Points (34%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

8453 Points (84%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

44221 Points (44%)

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

100%

470 ms (1%)

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

100%

345 Points (63%)

Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

134.5 Watt (23%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

134.2 Watt (24%)

Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

81.5 Watt (54%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

100%

17.4 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7600 → 0% ⁿ⁼⁰

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28

log 14. 11:27:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15006 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731580073s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15006 +0.002s ... 0.035s

#11 got single benchmarks 15006 +0s ... 0.035s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0s ... 0.035s

#13 got single benchmarks 13222 +0s ... 0.036s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.046s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)