Notebookcheck Logo

CSR8670 vs MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz vs MediaTek MT8161

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8163 V/B ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 MP2 Grafikkarte mit 520 MHz (Benchmarks) und einen DDR3x32 1600Mbps Speicherkontroller. An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0, Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN, FM und GPS.

Im Vergleich zum schnelleren MediaTek MT8163 V/A taktet die CPU niedriger (1,3 versus 1,5 GHz) und auch die GPU (520 versus 600 MHz).

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8161 ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 Grafikkarte und einen LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller (z.B. mit 1 GB im Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50). An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0 und Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN.

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

ModelCSR8670CSR8670MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHzMediaTek MT8161
Clock80 MHz80 MHz1300 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads224 / 44 / 4
Announced
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZoneLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)ARM Mali-T720 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8693 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8398 Points (7%)
93%
1 MT8161 +
9598 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (6%)     max: 648 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (2%)     max: 1797 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
601 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1583 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1888     avg: 1930     median: 1930 (3%)     max: 1972 Points
95%
1 MT8161 +
1838 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 617     avg: 638     median: 638 (10%)     max: 659 Points
97%
1 MT8161 +
616 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11818     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (16%)     max: 14321 ms
54%
1 MT8161 +
24610 ms (29%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1654 ms (16%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (2%)     max: 3320 Points
88%
1 MT8161 +
2510 Points (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (4%)     max: 25 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT8161 +
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT8161 +
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT8161 +
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
7512 points (17%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
26820 Points (27%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8161 +
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
79%
1 MT8161 +
3396 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 18:25:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8108 +0s ... 0s

#4 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#5 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734888306s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#6 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#7 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8108 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#12 got single benchmarks 8108 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#14 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.031s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.031s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)