AMD Athlon 300U vs Intel Core i9-12900HK vs Intel Core i5-12450H
AMD Athlon 300U ► remove from comparison
Der AMD Athlon 300U ist ein Mobilprozessor für schlanke Notebooks. Der SoC beinhaltet 2 Zen Kerne (Quad-Core CPU) mit SMT / Hyperthreading und dadurch können 4 Threads gleichzeitig abgearbeitet werden. Er ist sehr ähnlich zum höher getakteten (+200 MHz CPU und GPU) Ryzen 3 3200U. Im Vergleich zu den Ryzen 3000er APUs und dem Athlon Pro 300U ist der Athlon 300U noch in 14nm und nicht in 12nm gefertigt.
Bezüglich der Performance sollte sich der 300U etwas unter dem Ryzen 3 2200U einsortieren sollte.
Die integrierte Radeon RX Vega 3 bietet 3 CUs (192 Shader) mit bis zu 1000 MHz.
Die Features bleiben beim Athlon 300U vergleichbar zur Vorgängergeneration, wodurch wir auf unseren Raven Ridge APU Artikel verweisen können.
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Intel Core i5-12450H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-12450H ist eine Mid-Range-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet 4 der 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) für gesamt 8 Kerne (Octa-Core). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 12 Threads) und takten von 2 bis 4,4 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,5 - 3,3 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ ). Im Vergleich zum i5-12500H bietet der 12450 weniger Effizienzkerne, geringere Taktraten, eine schwächere iGPU und kein vPro.
Performance
Durch die Mischung aus P-Core und E-Cores sollte die Leistung in Multithreaded-Anwendungen vergleichbar sein mit ähnlich getakteten Tiger Lake-H CPUs und oberhalb der Tiger Lake 6-Kerner (wie i5-11500H ) liegen. Bei der Einzelkernperformance dürfte der 12450H auch noch schneller sein, dank der neuen Architektur.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12500H sind nur 48 der 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,2 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i5-12450H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (95W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der i5-12450H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Model AMD Athlon 300U Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Core i5-12450H Series AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Intel Alder Lake-P Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Zen Alder Lake-H Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 2400 - 3300 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz 1500 - 4400 MHz L1 Cache 192 KB 1.2 MB 704 KB L2 Cache 1 MB 11.5 MB 8 MB L3 Cache 4 MB 24 MB 12 MB Cores / Threads 2 / 4 14 / 20 8 / 12 TDP 15 Watt 45 Watt 45 Watt Transistors 4500 Million Technology 12 nm 10 nm 10 nm Socket AM4 BGA1744 BGA1744 Features XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
39.4 pt (66%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12450H
34.7 pt (58%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
min: 96.5 avg: 98.4 median: 98.5 (55%) max: 100 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 200 W 100% 95% 99% 92%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
min: 422 avg: 503 median: 509.5 (9%) max: 570 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 200 W 100% 55% 65% 65%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
min: 7662 avg: 8809 median: 8511 (8%) max: 10610 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 77% 43% 64% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100% 56%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
min: 1652 avg: 1666 median: 1663 (71%) max: 1688 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 76% 86% 91% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98% 85%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (34%)
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 75% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
min: 634 avg: 641 median: 642 (71%) max: 646 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 75% 88% 93% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99% 86%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (2%)
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 66% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
min: 2952 avg: 3415 median: 3270 (8%) max: 4105 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 66% 43% 65% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100% 57%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (2%)
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 62% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
min: 1150 avg: 1330 median: 1321 (8%) max: 1591 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 62% 42% 64% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100% 55%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (33%)
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
min: 227 avg: 236 median: 238 (67%) max: 239 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 73% 85% 91% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97% 81%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 83% 71% 100%
min: 14.61 avg: 15.7 median: 16.1 (21%) max: 16.55 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 49% 59% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 99% 82% 100%
min: 2.83 avg: 2.9 median: 2.9 (68%) max: 2.91 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 89% 91% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 Points (24%)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 42% 100% 82% 100%
min: 8166 avg: 8188 median: 8178 (49%) max: 8221 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 42% 87% 91% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 Points (6%)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 15% 87% 85% 100%
min: 32260 avg: 34923 median: 35790 (26%) max: 36720 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 15% 64% 69% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 99%
min: 50207 avg: 55957 median: 55999 (36%) max: 61665 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 82% 81% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 81%
min: 13344 avg: 13357 median: 13352 (16%) max: 13375 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 96% 100% 88%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 104% 104%
min: 431.842 avg: 440.2 median: 436 (5%) max: 452.626 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 101% 102% 104%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 102% 103%
min: 6.893 avg: 7.5 median: 7.2 (1%) max: 8.23 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 102% 102% 103%
1623 Points (3%)
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 17% 91% 77% 100%
min: 5658 avg: 5956 median: 6015 (10%) max: 6195 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 17% 63% 72% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
min: 31119 avg: 34052 median: 33584 (19%) max: 38415 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 82% 45% 65% 44% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94% 52%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
min: 4914 avg: 5157 median: 5144.5 (61%) max: 5386 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 82% 87% 90% 81% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94% 79%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (6%)
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 12% 78% 71% 100%
min: 75.9 avg: 79.1 median: 76 (25%) max: 85.35 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 12% 48% 60% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (20%)
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 28% 100% 87% 95%
min: 257.5 avg: 269 median: 272.5 (63%) max: 277 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 29% 91% 95% 92% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (3%)
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
min: 8.78 avg: 10.4 median: 10.4 (18%) max: 12.3 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 65% 45% 64% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100% 57%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 14% 80% 87% 100%
min: 0.703 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (23%) max: 0.797 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 14% 53% 60% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 11% 85% 88% 100%
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (22%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 11% 54% 60% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 12% 80% 87% 100%
min: 7 avg: 7.9 median: 8 (21%) max: 8.6 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 12% 53% 57% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (5%)
min: 573 avg: 673 median: 682 (9%) max: 767 Seconds
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 200 W 100% 102% 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 335 avg: 387.2 median: 394 (3%) max: 429 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 101% 100% 101% 100% 101% 102% 102% 102% 102% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 103% 102% 104% 104% 102% 104%
min: 0.4949 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (11%) max: 0.527 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 100% 102% 102% 101% 102% 104% 104% 102% 104% 101%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 86% 78% 100% 99%
min: 9897 avg: 11192 median: 11439 (24%) max: 11991 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 71% 71% 66% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 102% 101% 102%
min: 8.389 avg: 8.4 median: 8.4 (2%) max: 8.452 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 102%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 18.721 avg: 18.8 median: 18.7 (1%) max: 18.876 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 102% 102% 102%
min: 449.018 avg: 452.7 median: 451.4 (2%) max: 457.561 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 102% 102% 102% 102%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
min: 42422 avg: 46421 median: 46182 (35%) max: 50898 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 61% 67% 55% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (9%)
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
min: 12896 avg: 15157 median: 15232.5 (38%) max: 17594 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 65% 57% 71% 66% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100% 71%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 43% 100% 68% 74%
min: 79585 avg: 89333 median: 90156 (73%) max: 97433 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 45% 94% 98% 100% 71% 77%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 42% 100% 67% 74%
min: 79896 avg: 89470 median: 90458.5 (73%) max: 97065 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 44% 94% 98% 100% 70% 77%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (38%)
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 44% 100% 74% 92% 81%
min: 87275 avg: 92212 median: 90815 (75%) max: 99941 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 47% 95% 100% 92% 78% 98% 86%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 15% 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
min: 10809 avg: 12625 median: 13289 (34%) max: 13617 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 15% 58% 74% 63% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (8%)
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 66% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
min: 17079 avg: 19659 median: 20041 (36%) max: 22477 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 66% 60% 74% 66% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97% 72%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 60% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
min: 5938 avg: 6953 median: 6862.5 (29%) max: 8287 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 60% 45% 64% 53% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100% 58%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2611 Points (66%)
min: 2155 avg: 2237 median: 2249.5 (57%) max: 2293 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 200 W 97% 100% 91% 92%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
min: 7943 avg: 8386 median: 8223 (32%) max: 9109 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 200 W 93% 99% 87% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (34%)
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
min: 1581 avg: 1629 median: 1637.5 (64%) max: 1665 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 74% 85% 92% 82% 97% 100% 83% 98% 83%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1840 Points (3%)
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 66% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
min: 6804 avg: 7436 median: 7212 (13%) max: 8330 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 66% 54% 69% 52% 100% 98% 91% 99% 60%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 41% 97% 100% 99%
min: 1509 avg: 1563 median: 1575 (7%) max: 1594 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 41% 86% 89% 81% 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 Points (5%)
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 11% 75% 100% 98%
min: 6675 avg: 7214 median: 7120.5 (22%) max: 7938 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 11% 58% 58% 52% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 Points (33%)
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 41% 99% 99% 100%
min: 6930 avg: 7118 median: 7169.5 (72%) max: 7203 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 41% 90% 93% 86% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 Points (6%)
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 12% 77% 98% 100%
min: 26009 avg: 28043 median: 28052 (28%) max: 30058 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 12% 59% 61% 55% 98% 100%
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 556 avg: 564 median: 563 (1%) max: 576 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (19%)
94352 Points (79%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W 24% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 93%
min: 228 avg: 235 median: 238 (67%) max: 239 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 200 W 94% 100% 98% 90%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (26%)
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 44% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
min: 277 avg: 284.8 median: 285 (52%) max: 292 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 44% 87% 90% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (85%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
min: 1487 avg: 1549 median: 1542.5 (59%) max: 1637 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 200 W 74% 74% 81% 70% 85% 100% 82% 90% 73%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
min: 52.5 avg: 61.4 median: 60.2 (10%) max: 72.5 Watt
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 128% 125% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
min: 57.3 avg: 65.1 median: 62 (11%) max: 78.9 Watt
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 126% 122% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 156% 100%
min: 9.17 avg: 10.5 median: 10.8 (7%) max: 11.3 Watt
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 159% 159% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
20.1 Points per Watt (15%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 100% n=33 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 497% n=33 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12450H → 320% n=33
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 17. 09:18:05
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 14057 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731831485s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0s ... 0.005s
#9 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.001s ... 0.006s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#11 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.005s ... 0.015s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14057 +0.002s ... 0.017s
#13 got single benchmarks 14057 +0.003s ... 0.019s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.07s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.07s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte