Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

Die Qualcomm Adreno 690 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Windows-Notebooks und Tablets. Laut Qualcomm um ca. 60% schneller als die Vorgängergeneration (8cx Gen 2).

Die integrierte Qualcomm-GPU entspricht von ihrer Leistung her etwa einer Intel UHD Graphics. Damit ist ihre Leistung für den alltäglichen Betrieb ausreichend, für größere Sprünge reicht es nicht. Die meisten Spiele laufen auf der Adreno 690 auch gar nicht, von einzelnen Titeln aus dem Windows-Store vielleicht abgesehen (siehe unser Test des ThinkPad X13s).

Der Chip wird im 5nm Verfahren bei Samsung (5LPE) gefertigt und eignet sich weiterhin für lüfterlose Notebooks mit passiver Kühlung (7-9 Watt Klasse).

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Die Qualcomm Adreno 642L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G eingesetzte, ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.

Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642L GPU eine um 40% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G (vs 50% im Adreno 642). Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR5-Unterstützung ermöglicht.

Für Gaming unterstützt der Chip Variable Rate Shading und Qualcomm Game Quick Touch.

Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1. 

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 690Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Adreno 600 Serie
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryjaja
APIDirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2
Stromverbrauch7 Watt
Herstellungsprozess5 nm6 nm
Erscheinungsdatum06.12.2018 07.05.2021
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 38 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -95%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.18 -9%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.212 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
1.232 -5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
1.234 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
1.235 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
1.236 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
1.25 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
1.259 -3%
AMD FirePro W5170M
1.285 -1%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.295
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
1.363 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
1.382 7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.394 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
1.413 9%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
1.421 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
1.478 14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
1.479 14%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
1.504 16%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
1.541 19%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 1475%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 2471%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.4 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -83%
...
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
0.341 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
0.3432 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8570M
0.3489 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
0.3498 -5%
Intel HD Graphics 520
0.3549 -3%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
0.3617 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
0.3631 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
0.3639 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8670M
0.3661 0%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3675
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.3732 2%
AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
0.3759 2%
Intel HD Graphics 615
0.3768 3%
AMD FirePro M4100
0.3785 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
0.3803 3%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
0.386 5%
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
0.3865 5%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
0.388 6%
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
0.3962 8%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 5451%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 8961%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
4790 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
5577 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (5%)     max: 2911 Points
782 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
832 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
37738 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (27%)     max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (17%)     max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6320     avg: 6409     median: 6358 (56%)     max: 6798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 7138     avg: 7328     median: 7238 (43%)     max: 8182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4967     avg: 5076     median: 5031.5 (25%)     max: 5385 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5134     avg: 5267     median: 5205 (17%)     max: 5807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
1038 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (3%)     max: 2979 Points
968 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
7.2 fps (0%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (5%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 81     avg: 131.6     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (20%)     max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (67%)     max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 64% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
58%
Adreno 642L:
33.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
45%
Adreno 642L:
25  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
34%
Adreno 642L:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
35%
Adreno 642L:
13  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 642L:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 43%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%

Qualcomm Adreno 690lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







Qualcomm Adreno 642Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dota 2 Reborn33.72514.813
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

1
1

1
2
3
1
1
1






Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 05:00:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731470457s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.014s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 11411 +0s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.018s ... 0.039s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.063s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.063s

#15 Got 92 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.074s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.075s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.079s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.079s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.081s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)