Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 644 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip wurde Mitte 2022 vorgestellt und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 644 GPU eine um 20% höhere Performance als die Vorgängergeneration (Adreno 642 im 780G wahrscheinlich). Für die höhere Performance sorgt auch der Support für schnelleren Hauptspeicher mit bis zu 3200 MHz LPDDR5 (25,6 GB/s). In unseren Benchmarks mit dem Mi 13 Lite ist die Performance jedoch ziemlich vergleichbar mit einer Adreno 642.
alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G. Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR4X-4200-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt wie die Adreno 642 OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Der Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 und damit auch die Adreno 644 werden im modernen 4nm Prozess bei Samsung gefertigt.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 612 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 630 Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 4 nm 14 nm 10 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 Erscheinungsdatum 07.05.2021 15.12.2015 12.02.2018 Predecessor Adreno 642 Architektur Adreno 600
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501 avg: 6187 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767 avg: 7042 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114 avg: 6700 median: 6700 (60%) max: 7285 Points
min: 1606 avg: 1849 median: 1745 (16%) max: 2285 Points
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410 avg: 8641 median: 8487 (51%) max: 9025 Points
min: 1427 avg: 1715 median: 1594 (10%) max: 2173 Points
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090 avg: 5524 median: 5565 (27%) max: 5876 Points
min: 937 avg: 1108 median: 978 (5%) max: 1480 Points
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779 avg: 6156 median: 6159.5 (21%) max: 6524 Points
min: 823 avg: 952 median: 829 (3%) max: 1286 Points
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3137 (2%) max: 3184 Points
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825 avg: 832 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
143 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.4 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 16.4 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41 avg: 45.3 median: 46 (3%) max: 49 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 644 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
14.3 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (6%) max: 23891 Points
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (14%) max: 15659 Points
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 23% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 80% n=16
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
90%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
98%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 72% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 98% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 06:29:09
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731562149s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.03s ... 0.034s
#10 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.009s ... 0.043s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.043s
#12 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.008s ... 0.051s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.051s
#14 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.072s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.105s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.105s
#18 Got 115 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.123s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.123s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.125s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.132s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.132s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.132s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
