Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642L vs Qualcomm Adreno 630

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Die Qualcomm Adreno 642L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G eingesetzte, ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.

Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642L GPU eine um 40% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G (vs 50% im Adreno 642). Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR5-Unterstützung ermöglicht.

Für Gaming unterstützt der Chip Variable Rate Shading und Qualcomm Game Quick Touch.

Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1. 

Qualcomm Adreno 630

► remove from comparison

Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.

Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 642LQualcomm Adreno 630
Adreno 600 Serie
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryjaja
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess6 nm10 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12
Erscheinungsdatum07.05.2021 12.02.2018
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 38 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8508 x 2750 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8458 x 2800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.4 pt (1%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.06581 -82%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.09938 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.2266 -38%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3675
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 8961%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
min: 36810     avg: 78986     median: 81385.5 (8%)     max: 85487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4790 Points (5%)
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5577 Points (1%)
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
782 Points (1%)
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
832 Points (1%)
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
min: 4034     avg: 5761     median: 6083 (26%)     max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
min: 5228     avg: 7671     median: 8245 (18%)     max: 8451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (23%)     max: 5763 Points
min: 3512     avg: 4589     median: 4765 (20%)     max: 5200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (14%)     max: 6240 Points
min: 4133     avg: 5424     median: 5673 (14%)     max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6320     avg: 6409     median: 6358 (56%)     max: 6798 Points
min: 4363     avg: 5811     median: 6118 (54%)     max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 7138     avg: 7328     median: 7238 (43%)     max: 8182 Points
min: 5637     avg: 7763     median: 8179 (49%)     max: 8312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4967     avg: 5076     median: 5031.5 (25%)     max: 5385 Points
min: 3197     avg: 4388     median: 4617 (23%)     max: 4734 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5134     avg: 5267     median: 5205 (17%)     max: 5807 Points
min: 3488     avg: 4919     median: 5158 (17%)     max: 5246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1038 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
968 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
7.2 fps (0%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
min: 11     avg: 15.6     median: 14 (3%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
min: 29     avg: 35.2     median: 37 (3%)     max: 38 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
min: 25     avg: 33.4     median: 35 (4%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
min: 20.63     avg: 52.5     median: 58 (1%)     max: 61 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (3%)     max: 89 fps
min: 54     avg: 73.1     median: 75 (3%)     max: 83 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 81     avg: 131.6     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
min: 88.2     avg: 140.2     median: 150 (1%)     max: 152 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (16%)     max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (1%)     max: 54.4 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
min: 10791     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (4%)     max: 13082 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (67%)     max: 43000 Points
min: 4195     avg: 4225     median: 4225 (7%)     max: 4255 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 91% n=23

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
100%
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
Hearthstone

Hearthstone

2020
low 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
29.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
27.8  fps
League of Legends

League of Legends

2019
low 1280x720
Adreno 630:
0 (!)  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
103%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
95%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 35 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 36 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 630:
44 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 630:
60 60 109 ~ 76 fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 642L:
33.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 642L:
25  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 642L:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 642L:
13  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Adreno 630:
6  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 630:
5  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 630:
5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
3  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 630:
29  fps
high
Adreno 630:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
29 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
113%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 30 30 61 ~ 34 fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
Adreno 630:
20  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 630:
14  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 630:
13  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
4  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 630:
60  fps
high
Adreno 630:
101  fps
Diablo III

Diablo III

2012
low 1024x768
Adreno 630:
10.3  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 642L:
90  fps
67%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Minecraft - Pocket Edition

Minecraft - Pocket Edition

2011
ultra
Adreno 630:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 97%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%

Qualcomm Adreno 642Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dota 2 Reborn33.72514.813
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

1
1

1
2
3
1
1
1






Qualcomm Adreno 630lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hearthstone29.327.8
League of Legends
PUBG Mobile604036
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor5759
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay6076
Thief6553
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 8: Airborne2930
Asphalt 9: Legends3034
BioShock Infinite2014134
Real Racing 360101
Diablo III10.3
Subway Surfers60
Minecraft - Pocket Edition60
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
2
4
2
1

3
3
6
2
1
1






Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 09:49:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734857396s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#9 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.02s ... 0.055s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.055s

#11 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.075s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.107s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.107s

#15 Got 143 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.12s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.12s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.122s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.13s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.13s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.13s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)