Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP5 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ► remove from comparison
Die ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ist eine integrierte Mittelklasse-Grafikeinheit für ARM-basierte SoCs, welche in Smartphones und Tablets mit Android Verwendung finden kann. Die G68-Serie lässt sich theoretisch mit bis zu sechs Kernen nutzen.
Die ARM Mali-G68 ist eine auf der Valhall-Architektur basierende GPU und wird von ARM für Geräte der Sub-Premiumklasse ausgelobt. Sie ermöglicht komplexe Anwendungsfälle von High-Fidelity-Grafik bis hin zu maschinellem Lernen (ML) und unterstützt alle aktuellen APIs wie Vulkan 1.2, OpenGL ES 3.2 und OpenCL 2.0.
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 660 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 868 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 660 GPU eine um 35% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 650 im Snapdragon 865. Außerdem konnte die Energieeffizienz um 20% erhöht werden (auch dank des neuen 5nm Prozess).
Neben der Performance gab es auch noch Qualitätsverbesserungen bei der Darstellung (siehe Bild).
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ARM Mali-G68 MP5 Qualcomm Adreno 660 Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja nein ja API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 10 nm 5 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 12.02.2018 14.09.2021 02.12.2020 Codename Valhall Architektur Valhall Pipelines 5 - unified Herstellerseite www.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
200519 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
min: 6103 avg: 6217 median: 6224 (27%) max: 6317 Points
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
min: 7030 avg: 7122 median: 7134 (16%) max: 7189 Points
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
min: 4897 avg: 4978 median: 5002 (25%) max: 5043 Points
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
min: 5118 avg: 5208 median: 5233 (16%) max: 5323 Points
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
min: 5790 avg: 5815 median: 5792 (51%) max: 5864 Points
min: 7991 avg: 8422 median: 8055 (72%) max: 9221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
min: 6630 avg: 6658 median: 6647 (40%) max: 6698 Points
min: 10111 avg: 11212 median: 10261 (62%) max: 13263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
min: 4629 avg: 4724 median: 4730.5 (23%) max: 4805 Points
min: 6140 avg: 6868 median: 6868 (34%) max: 7596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
min: 4848 avg: 4966 median: 4972 (17%) max: 5070 Points
min: 6816 avg: 8126 median: 8126 (27%) max: 9436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2796 avg: 2911 median: 2955 (1%) max: 2987 Points
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 796 avg: 1252 median: 825 (1%) max: 3001 Points
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (2%) max: 6 fps
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.4 median: 13 (2%) max: 14 fps
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
min: 34 avg: 34.4 median: 34 (3%) max: 35 fps
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
min: 30 avg: 30.8 median: 31 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
min: 52 avg: 52.2 median: 52 (1%) max: 53 fps
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
min: 78 avg: 79 median: 79 (5%) max: 80 fps
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 630 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP5
min: 118 avg: 119 median: 119 (1%) max: 120 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857 avg: 147409 median: 148214 (18%) max: 149350 Points
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45 avg: 41.7 median: 41.7 (0%) max: 41.92 fps
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971 avg: 3046 median: 3069 (1%) max: 3098 Points
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039 avg: 3083 median: 3102 (1%) max: 3109 Points
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
12517 Points (4%)
53822 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
3997 Points (7%)
42266 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32 avg: 5.1 median: 5.2 (2%) max: 6.04 Watt
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 94% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 241% n=16
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
50 56 58 ~ 55 fps
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
43 50 ~ 47 fps
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
50%
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
150%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
176%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 118% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 155%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 160% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 141%
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 58.5 Genshin Impact 55 47 38 PUBG Mobile 30 30 32 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 1 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 06:34:58
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11584 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731562497s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.003s
#10 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.003s ... 0.006s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0s ... 0.006s
#12 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.001s ... 0.007s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.007s
#14 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.003s ... 0.011s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.036s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.036s
#18 Got 220 rows for game benchmarks. +0.036s ... 0.072s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.072s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.073s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.08s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.08s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.081s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
