Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 660 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 868 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 660 GPU eine um 35% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 650 im Snapdragon 865. Außerdem konnte die Energieeffizienz um 20% erhöht werden (auch dank des neuen 5nm Prozess).
Neben der Performance gab es auch noch Qualitätsverbesserungen bei der Darstellung (siehe Bild).
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 690 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Windows-Notebooks und Tablets. Laut Qualcomm um ca. 60% schneller als die Vorgängergeneration (8cx Gen 2).
Die integrierte Qualcomm-GPU entspricht von ihrer Leistung her etwa einer Intel UHD Graphics . Damit ist ihre Leistung für den alltäglichen Betrieb ausreichend, für größere Sprünge reicht es nicht. Die meisten Spiele laufen auf der Adreno 690 auch gar nicht, von einzelnen Titeln aus dem Windows-Store vielleicht abgesehen (siehe unser Test des ThinkPad X13s ).
Der Chip wird im 5nm Verfahren bei Samsung (5LPE) gefertigt und eignet sich weiterhin für lüfterlose Notebooks mit passiver Kühlung (7-9 Watt Klasse).
Qualcomm Adreno 630 Qualcomm Adreno 660 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 Herstellungsprozess 10 nm 7 nm 5 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 12.02.2018 02.12.2020 06.12.2018 Stromverbrauch 7 Watt
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
200519 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (9%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
min: 7991 avg: 8422 median: 8055 (72%) max: 9221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
min: 10111 avg: 11212 median: 10261 (62%) max: 13263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
min: 6140 avg: 6868 median: 6868 (34%) max: 7596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
min: 6816 avg: 8126 median: 8126 (27%) max: 9436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 630 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
53822 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
42266 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 0% n=0 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 0% n=0 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 0% n=0
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
150%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
176%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 160% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 141%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 06:45:50
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731563150s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.003s
#10 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.003s ... 0.006s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.006s
#12 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.002s ... 0.011s
#14 got single benchmarks 11411 +0s ... 0.012s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.031s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.031s
#18 Got 241 rows for game benchmarks. +0.034s ... 0.065s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.065s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.066s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.074s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.074s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.074s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
