Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 644 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip wurde Mitte 2022 vorgestellt und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 644 GPU eine um 20% höhere Performance als die Vorgängergeneration (Adreno 642 im 780G wahrscheinlich). Für die höhere Performance sorgt auch der Support für schnelleren Hauptspeicher mit bis zu 3200 MHz LPDDR5 (25,6 GB/s). In unseren Benchmarks mit dem Mi 13 Lite ist die Performance jedoch ziemlich vergleichbar mit einer Adreno 642.
alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G. Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR4X-4200-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt wie die Adreno 642 OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Der Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 und damit auch die Adreno 644 werden im modernen 4nm Prozess bei Samsung gefertigt.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Qualcomm Adreno 619L Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan Herstellungsprozess 10 nm 4 nm 8 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Erscheinungsdatum 12.02.2018 07.05.2021 15.12.2015 Predecessor Adreno 642 Architektur Adreno 600
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6187 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7042 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
min: 6114 avg: 6700 median: 6700 (60%) max: 7285 Points
min: 3208 avg: 3212 median: 3211.5 (29%) max: 3215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
min: 8410 avg: 8641 median: 8487 (51%) max: 9025 Points
min: 3197 avg: 3201 median: 3200.5 (19%) max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
min: 5090 avg: 5524 median: 5565 (27%) max: 5876 Points
min: 2178 avg: 2188 median: 2188 (11%) max: 2198 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
min: 5779 avg: 6156 median: 6159.5 (21%) max: 6524 Points
min: 1982 avg: 1987 median: 1987 (7%) max: 1992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3137 (2%) max: 3184 Points
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825 avg: 832 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
247 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.4 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.4 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
min: 41 avg: 45.3 median: 46 (3%) max: 49 fps
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
26 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 630 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
30029 Points (10%)
13095 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
42541 Points (70%)
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
2.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 179% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 48% n=16
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
67%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
111%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
83%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
102%
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 103% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 82% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 82%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 14. 06:03:02
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731560580s time from redirect:2 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0.032s ... 0.036s
#10 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.056s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.057s
#12 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.065s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.066s
#14 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.004s ... 0.07s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.104s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.104s
#18 Got 116 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.121s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.121s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.122s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.128s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.128s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.129s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
