Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 610 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Die Performance der Adreno 610 liegt im Einsteigersegment und reiht sich zwischen Adreno 510 und 512 bzw. 612 ein.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 680 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Windows-Notebooks und Tablets. Der Chip soll ab Mitte/Ende 2019 erhältlich sein. Architekturell ist die GPU ähnlich zum Adreno 640 . Laut Qualcomm 2x schneller als die alte Adreno 630 im Snapdragon 850 für Windows Laptops bei 60% verbesserter Effizienz.
Die Leistung soll verleichbar mit einer Intel UHD Graphics 620 sein, jedoch nur bei nativ für ARM64 kompilierten Spielen und Programmen. Im Emulator laufen nur 32-Bit-Applikationen (keine 64-Bit für AMD/Intel kompilierte) und mit einem deutlichen Geschwindigkeitsnachteil.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 Qualcomm Adreno 610 Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12 Herstellungsprozess 10 nm 11 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Erscheinungsdatum 12.02.2018 09.04.2019 06.12.2018 Architektur Adreno 600 Stromverbrauch 7 Watt
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
min: 15403 avg: 22761 median: 24487.5 (2%) max: 25351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
min: 975 avg: 1855 median: 1827.5 (8%) max: 2254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
min: 1295 avg: 1759 median: 1746.5 (4%) max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
min: 267 avg: 1171 median: 1175 (6%) max: 1597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
min: 240 avg: 1034 median: 1032 (3%) max: 1436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
min: 1400 avg: 1836 median: 1797 (16%) max: 2222 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
min: 1270 avg: 1713 median: 1691 (10%) max: 2095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
min: 854 avg: 1210 median: 1164 (6%) max: 1905 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
min: 726 avg: 1040 median: 1021 (3%) max: 1394 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 205 avg: 408.6 median: 425.5 (0%) max: 634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 100 avg: 120.1 median: 122 (0%) max: 141 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650 avg: 1847 median: 1847 (2%) max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593 avg: 1936 median: 1935.5 (2%) max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680 353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.1 avg: 1.4 median: 1.4 (1%) max: 1.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 1.4 avg: 2.8 median: 2.8 (1%) max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
min: 5.1 avg: 8.3 median: 8.3 (1%) max: 10.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
min: 5.2 avg: 7.3 median: 7.2 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
min: 9.3 avg: 13.3 median: 13 (0%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
min: 14 avg: 19.5 median: 19 (1%) max: 24 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610 min: 24 avg: 36.1 median: 36 (0%) max: 45 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 23743 avg: 39171 median: 38601 (5%) max: 53821 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 8.79 avg: 11.7 median: 11.4 (0%) max: 14.76 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 343 avg: 346 median: 346 (0%) max: 349 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
577 Points (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
min: 7370 avg: 16213 median: 17873 (6%) max: 21734 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
min: 1595 avg: 12281 median: 13408 (22%) max: 20711 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.25 avg: 3.4 median: 3 (1%) max: 6.42 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 24% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 93% n=1
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 610:
56 59 [X] Vivo Y20s 1.1.0.3585
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 [X] Oppo A74 1.59.8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
33 fps, max:
57 fps
50 [X] Xiaomi Poco M3 1.56.8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
28 fps, max:
60 fps
53 [X] Lenovo Tab P11 1.57.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
42 fps, max:
60 fps
54 [X] Vivo Y20s 1.55.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
42 fps, max:
60 fps
57 57 [X] Nokia 3.4 1.56.8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
41 fps, max:
60 fps
59 59 60 [X] Motorola Defy 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
53 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9i 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
36 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Honor Pad 8 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
87 ~ 52 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
67%
Adreno 610:
30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G8 1.34.1.10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz
Adreno 610
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia 3.4 1.37.1.9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi A3 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz
Adreno 610
min:
49 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 38 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
64%
Adreno 610:
30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G8 1.34.1.10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz
Adreno 610
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia 3.4 1.37.1.9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi A3 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz
Adreno 610
min:
28 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 38 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
103%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 610:
60 [X] Vivo Y20s 1.72.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz
Adreno 610
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 72% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 78%
v1.28
log 14. 06:42:09
#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731562929s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0.01s ... 0.013s
#10 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.033s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0s ... 0.033s
#12 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.007s ... 0.04s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0s ... 0.041s
#14 got single benchmarks 9846 +0s ... 0.041s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.071s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.071s
#18 Got 200 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.101s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.101s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.103s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.112s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.112s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.112s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)