Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs ARM Mali-G57 MP1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ► remove from comparison
Die ARM Mali-G57 MP1 / MC1 ist eine integrierte Einstiegs-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals im Smartphone-Chip UniSoc T616 verbaut wurde.
Die Mali-G57 basiert auf der Valhall-Architektur und wird von ARM als kostengünstige und kleine Grafikkarte für Mainstream-Smartphones beworben.
Wie der Name schon vermuten lässt, arbeitet in der Grafikeinheit ein Dual-Pixel-Kerne mit 128KB oder 256KB L2-Cache.
An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G57 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 und Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 660 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 868 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 660 GPU eine um 35% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 650 im Snapdragon 865. Außerdem konnte die Energieeffizienz um 20% erhöht werden (auch dank des neuen 5nm Prozess).
Neben der Performance gab es auch noch Qualitätsverbesserungen bei der Darstellung (siehe Bild).
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ARM Mali-G57 MP1 Qualcomm Adreno 660 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Bifrost Shared Memory ja nein ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 7 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 03.07.2020 02.12.2020 Codename Valhall Pipelines 1 - unified Herstellerseite developer.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
200519 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 1414 avg: 1548 median: 1506 (7%) max: 1710 Points
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 1255 avg: 1386 median: 1343 (3%) max: 1518 Points
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 958 avg: 1003 median: 978.5 (5%) max: 1109 Points
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 814 avg: 854 median: 829 (2%) max: 942 Points
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208 avg: 3212 median: 3211.5 (29%) max: 3215 Points
min: 1385 avg: 1487 median: 1437 (13%) max: 1656 Points
min: 7991 avg: 8422 median: 8055 (72%) max: 9221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197 avg: 3201 median: 3200.5 (19%) max: 3204 Points
min: 1236 avg: 1331 median: 1308 (8%) max: 1471 Points
min: 10111 avg: 11212 median: 10261 (62%) max: 13263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178 avg: 2188 median: 2188 (11%) max: 2198 Points
min: 361 avg: 949 median: 958 (5%) max: 1103 Points
min: 6140 avg: 6868 median: 6868 (34%) max: 7596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982 avg: 1987 median: 1987 (7%) max: 1992 Points
min: 290 avg: 809 median: 816 (3%) max: 935 Points
min: 6816 avg: 8126 median: 8126 (27%) max: 9436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
min: 392 avg: 431.5 median: 422 (0%) max: 500 Points
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 99 avg: 114.1 median: 111 (0%) max: 136 Points
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.8 avg: 1.2 median: 0.9 (0%) max: 6.6 fps
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 0.85 avg: 2.1 median: 2 (0%) max: 2.6 fps
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 1.9 avg: 5.6 median: 5.5 (0%) max: 7.1 fps
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 4.9 avg: 5.7 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 6.9 fps
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 6.1 avg: 9 median: 8.9 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 11 avg: 14.7 median: 14 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP1 min: 20 avg: 23.2 median: 22 (0%) max: 28 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
min: 22069 avg: 30972 median: 30203 (4%) max: 39165 Points
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
min: 9.58 avg: 10.5 median: 10.5 (0%) max: 11.4 fps
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 443 avg: 460.2 median: 452.5 (0%) max: 512 Points
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 433 avg: 467.7 median: 453 (0%) max: 529 Points
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
min: 8097 avg: 13148 median: 13735 (5%) max: 17613 Points
53822 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 11168 avg: 12945 median: 11902 (20%) max: 15764 Points
42266 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 1.642 avg: 4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 6.79 Watt
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=20 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 76% n=20 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 524% n=20
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G57 MP1:
58 [X] Realme C35 1.61.6
UNISOC T616 1.8GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
75%
Mali-G57 MP1:
30 [X] Realme C35 1.9.0
UNISOC T616 1.8GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP1:
29 [X] Teclast P26T 3.0.0
Allwinner A523 0.5GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
17 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme C35 1.9.0
UNISOC T616 1.8GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
15 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
180%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
90%
Mali-G57 MP1:
26 [X] Teclast P26T 4.4.0k
Allwinner A523 0.5GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
11 fps, max:
37 fps
fps
207%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G57 MP1:
61 [X] Teclast P26T 3.23.1
Allwinner A523 0.5GHz
Mali-G57 MP1
min:
29 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP1 → 88% Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 168% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 150%
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 58 PUBG Mobile 30 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 26 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 14. 06:45:45
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11103 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731563144s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.01s ... 0.014s
#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0s ... 0.014s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11103 +0s ... 0.014s
#12 got single benchmarks 11103 +0.032s ... 0.046s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.046s
#14 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.004s ... 0.051s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.077s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.077s
#18 Got 126 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.1s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.1s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.1s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.103s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.104s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)