Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 732 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 732 ist eine integrierte Grafikeinheit, welche im Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 zum Einsatz kommt und für Smartphones sowie Tablets konzipiert ist. Das dazugehörige SoC (System-on-a-Chip) wurde im März 2024 vorgestellt und ist in vielen Android-basierten Produkten der oberen Mittelklasse und der Oberklasse zu finden.
Nach Gerüchten taktet der Chip mit 950 MHz und bietet zwei Pipelines.
Die Adreno 732 unterstützt Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 und DirectX 12.1. Mittels KI-Upscaling soll es ohne größere Akku-Belastung möglich sein, die Frameraten zu erhöhen und die Effizienz von einigen Grafikeffekten zu erhöhen.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L Qualcomm Adreno 732 Qualcomm Adreno 630 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 4 nm 10 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.1, Frame Motion Engine, Volumetric Rendering, VRS Pro OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 23.03.2024 12.02.2018
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
7666 Points (38%)
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
11506 Points (34%)
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208 avg: 3212 median: 3211.5 (29%) max: 3215 Points
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197 avg: 3201 median: 3200.5 (19%) max: 3204 Points
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178 avg: 2188 median: 2188 (11%) max: 2198 Points
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982 avg: 1987 median: 1987 (7%) max: 1992 Points
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
11512 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
2844 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
22 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
49 fps (9%)
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
130 fps (10%)
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
105 fps (12%)
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
191 fps (4%)
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
271 fps (16%)
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 732
491 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
455425 Points (57%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
148.7 fps (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
43633 Points (15%)
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
54938 Points (91%)
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
11 Watt (4%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 890% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 216% n=10
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 732:
59.9 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
57 fps, P1:
57.66 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 732:
59.7 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
56 fps, P1:
56 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Adreno 732:
58.1 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
50 fps, P1:
50.56 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 732:
40.7 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
33 fps, P1:
35.44 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
218%
Adreno 732:
87.1 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
80 fps, P1:
80.62 fps, max:
90 fps
fps
150%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
120%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
Adreno 732:
39.4 [X] OnePlus Nord 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 1.9GHz
Adreno 732
min:
35 fps, P1:
37.1 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
117%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
168%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 218% Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 126% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%
Qualcomm Adreno 732 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59.9 59.7 Genshin Impact 58.1 40.7 PUBG Mobile 87.1 39.4 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 3
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 15. 10:34:59
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 12763 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731663299s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.027s ... 0.032s
#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.005s ... 0.037s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12763 +0s ... 0.037s
#12 got single benchmarks 12763 +0.003s ... 0.04s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.041s
#14 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.061s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.089s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.089s
#18 Got 107 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.103s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.103s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.104s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.112s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.112s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.112s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
