Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 660 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 868 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 660 GPU eine um 35% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 650 im Snapdragon 865. Außerdem konnte die Energieeffizienz um 20% erhöht werden (auch dank des neuen 5nm Prozess).
Neben der Performance gab es auch noch Qualitätsverbesserungen bei der Darstellung (siehe Bild).
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 612 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L Qualcomm Adreno 660 Qualcomm Adreno 612 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 7 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 02.12.2020 15.12.2015
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
200519 Points (20%)
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208 avg: 3212 median: 3211.5 (29%) max: 3215 Points
min: 7991 avg: 8422 median: 8055 (72%) max: 9221 Points
min: 1606 avg: 1849 median: 1745 (16%) max: 2285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197 avg: 3201 median: 3200.5 (19%) max: 3204 Points
min: 10111 avg: 11212 median: 10261 (62%) max: 13263 Points
min: 1427 avg: 1715 median: 1594 (10%) max: 2173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178 avg: 2188 median: 2188 (11%) max: 2198 Points
min: 6140 avg: 6868 median: 6868 (34%) max: 7596 Points
min: 937 avg: 1108 median: 978 (5%) max: 1480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982 avg: 1987 median: 1987 (7%) max: 1992 Points
min: 6816 avg: 8126 median: 8126 (27%) max: 9436 Points
min: 823 avg: 952 median: 829 (3%) max: 1286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
143 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
14.3 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
53822 Points (18%)
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (6%) max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
42266 Points (70%)
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (14%) max: 15659 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=21 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 520% n=21 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 78% n=21
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
180%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
207%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
79%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 168% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 150%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 95% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 06:58:59
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731563939s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.004s
#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0s ... 0.004s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.004s
#12 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.004s ... 0.009s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.009s
#14 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.001s ... 0.01s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.03s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.03s
#18 Got 129 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.048s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.048s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.049s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.052s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.052s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.052s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
