Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 616 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 616 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 616 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der oberen Mittelklasse positioniert.
Qualcomm gibt bis zu 30% höhere Performance an (wahrscheinlich im Vergleich zum Adreno 512 im Snapdragon 660 ).
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 685 ist eine im Microsoft SQ1 integrierte Grafikeinheit für Windows-Tablets (Microsoft Surface X). Technisch eine Adreno 680 wie im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx ARM-SoC , jedoch wahrscheinlich höher getaktet. Microsoft gibt 2 Tflops theoretische Leistung an, versus 1.8 bei der Adreno 680 im 8cx.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L Qualcomm Adreno 616 Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12 Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 14 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 06.12.2018 Stromverbrauch 7 Watt
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 22381 avg: 37106 median: 38288.5 (4%) max: 43514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 2217 avg: 2635 median: 2636 (11%) max: 2859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 2146 avg: 2733 median: 2847 (6%) max: 3248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 1742 avg: 1917 median: 1913.5 (10%) max: 2217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 1611 avg: 1825 median: 1853.5 (6%) max: 2147 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208 avg: 3212 median: 3211.5 (29%) max: 3215 Points
min: 2073 avg: 2569 median: 2567.5 (23%) max: 2978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197 avg: 3201 median: 3200.5 (19%) max: 3204 Points
min: 1980 avg: 2609 median: 2727.5 (16%) max: 3100 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178 avg: 2188 median: 2188 (11%) max: 2198 Points
min: 1594 avg: 1805 median: 1826 (9%) max: 2073 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982 avg: 1987 median: 1987 (7%) max: 1992 Points
min: 1451 avg: 1676 median: 1705.5 (6%) max: 1980 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 4.4 avg: 5.2 median: 5.1 (1%) max: 7.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 12 avg: 13.6 median: 14 (1%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 8.5 avg: 12.5 median: 13 (1%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 19 avg: 22.4 median: 23 (0%) max: 26 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 29 avg: 31.8 median: 32 (2%) max: 36 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 616
min: 46 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 74 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
min: 8622 avg: 9428 median: 9192.5 (3%) max: 10698 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 2466 avg: 2689 median: 2629.5 (4%) max: 2911 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 89% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 159% n=2
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
90%
Adreno 616:
30 38 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
26 fps, max:
42 fps
40 ~ 36 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 616:
31 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 53 fps
Adreno 616:
54 57 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
8 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 58 fps
Adreno 616:
59 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.16.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 616:
59 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.16.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
53 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Oppo R17 Pro 1.18.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 60 fps
83%
Adreno 616:
30 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 60 ~ 50 fps
Adreno 616:
26 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
12 fps, max:
31 fps
29 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.3.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
97%
Adreno 616:
22 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
11 fps, max:
31 fps
27 29 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.3.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
29 29 [X] Oppo R17 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
29 30 30 ~ 28 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 92% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 87%
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 616 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 36 30 Arena of Valor 53 58 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dead Trigger 2 50 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 28 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
v1.28
log 14. 06:24:17
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9401 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731561857s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0s ... 0.003s
#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0s ... 0.004s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9401 +0s ... 0.004s
#12 got single benchmarks 9401 +0.002s ... 0.006s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0s ... 0.006s
#14 got single benchmarks 9954 +0s ... 0.006s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.006s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.018s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.018s
#18 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.027s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.027s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.027s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.029s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.029s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.03s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)