Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 618 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 und 730G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der oberen Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Performance der Adreno 618 sollte leicht oberhalb der Adreno 616 liegen. In unseren Benchmarks sehen wir eine 14 - 30% höhere Performance. Falls die GPU im 730G verbaut wird, ist zusätzlich mit einer 15% höheren Leistung zu rechnen (durch höhere Taktraten).
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 642 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642 GPU eine um 50% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G. Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR4X-4200-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Als "G"-Chip unterstützt der 780G Snapdragon Elite Gaming mit updatebaren GPU Treibern.
Qualcomm Adreno 619 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 642 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 14 nm 5 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 09.04.2019 07.05.2021
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788 avg: 55662 median: 55911 (6%) max: 56286 Points
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (5%) max: 56640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602 avg: 4041 median: 4118 (18%) max: 4286 Points
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817 avg: 4280 median: 4298 (9%) max: 4573 Points
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536 avg: 2906 median: 2981.5 (15%) max: 3107 Points
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412 avg: 2788 median: 2834 (8%) max: 3008 Points
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825 avg: 3855 median: 3993.5 (35%) max: 4156 Points
min: 2845 avg: 3469 median: 3528 (31%) max: 4021 Points
6989 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647 avg: 4097 median: 4145 (25%) max: 4414 Points
min: 2720 avg: 3552 median: 3610 (22%) max: 4232 Points
8588 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757 avg: 2728 median: 2812.5 (14%) max: 2983 Points
min: 2192 avg: 2505 median: 2489 (12%) max: 2783 Points
5098 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593 avg: 2593 median: 2655.5 (9%) max: 2845 Points
min: 2008 avg: 2355 median: 2310 (8%) max: 2694 Points
6087 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635 avg: 1119 median: 1196 (1%) max: 1578 Points
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189 avg: 329.9 median: 351 (0%) max: 410 Points
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
786 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9 avg: 3.5 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3 avg: 7.4 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17 avg: 20.2 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 18.5 median: 19 (2%) max: 21 fps
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26 avg: 32.5 median: 34 (1%) max: 36 fps
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33 avg: 45.5 median: 46 (3%) max: 68 fps
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 619 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55 avg: 88.2 median: 91 (1%) max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241 avg: 91752 median: 97328 (12%) max: 106719 Points
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62 avg: 27.1 median: 26.9 (0%) max: 31.27 fps
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
48 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363 avg: 1377 median: 1377.5 (0%) max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119 avg: 1168 median: 1160 (0%) max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763 avg: 68002 median: 26723 (9%) max: 291780 Points
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (4%) max: 27578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274 avg: 20485 median: 22822.5 (38%) max: 28746 Points
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69 avg: 3.7 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 7.31 Watt
3.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=18 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 89% n=18 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 198% n=18
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
Adreno 619:
29.7 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, P1:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
29.4 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
21 fps, P1:
22.28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 [X] Honor Magic4 Lite 3.2.0.5531
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
60 [X] Sony Xperia 10 V 4.3.0.6993
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
28 fps
29.8 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
15 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
39 fps
45 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
54 ~ 37 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
36 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
47 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
20 fps
28 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
11 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
30 fps
30 ~ 27 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 60 [X] Nokia X20 1.59.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia X10 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia XR20 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Nokia X30 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
61 fps
60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
28 [X] Nokia X20 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
13 fps, max:
31 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, P1:
23.04 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X10 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia XR20 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X30 2.2.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Poco X5 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia XR21 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia G42 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 142% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 97%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 157% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 179%
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 14. 06:02:51
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731560563s time from redirect:7 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.011s ... 0.014s
#10 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.005s ... 0.019s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.001s ... 0.02s
#12 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.024s ... 0.044s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0s ... 0.044s
#14 got single benchmarks 10693 +0s ... 0.045s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.076s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.076s
#18 Got 207 rows for game benchmarks. +0.033s ... 0.109s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.109s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.11s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.115s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.115s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.115s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
