Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 612 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 644 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip wurde Mitte 2022 vorgestellt und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 644 GPU eine um 20% höhere Performance als die Vorgängergeneration (Adreno 642 im 780G wahrscheinlich). Für die höhere Performance sorgt auch der Support für schnelleren Hauptspeicher mit bis zu 3200 MHz LPDDR5 (25,6 GB/s). In unseren Benchmarks mit dem Mi 13 Lite ist die Performance jedoch ziemlich vergleichbar mit einer Adreno 642.
alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G. Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR4X-4200-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt wie die Adreno 642 OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Der Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 und damit auch die Adreno 644 werden im modernen 4nm Prozess bei Samsung gefertigt.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 619 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 14 nm 8 nm 4 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 07.05.2021 Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
min: 54788 avg: 55662 median: 55911 (6%) max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 3602 avg: 4041 median: 4118 (18%) max: 4286 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 3817 avg: 4280 median: 4298 (9%) max: 4573 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 2536 avg: 2906 median: 2981.5 (15%) max: 3107 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6187 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 2412 avg: 2788 median: 2834 (8%) max: 3008 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7042 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1606 avg: 1849 median: 1745 (16%) max: 2285 Points
min: 2825 avg: 3855 median: 3993.5 (35%) max: 4156 Points
min: 6114 avg: 6700 median: 6700 (60%) max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1427 avg: 1715 median: 1594 (10%) max: 2173 Points
min: 3647 avg: 4097 median: 4145 (25%) max: 4414 Points
min: 8410 avg: 8641 median: 8487 (51%) max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 937 avg: 1108 median: 978 (5%) max: 1480 Points
min: 1757 avg: 2728 median: 2812.5 (14%) max: 2983 Points
min: 5090 avg: 5524 median: 5565 (27%) max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 823 avg: 952 median: 829 (3%) max: 1286 Points
min: 1593 avg: 2593 median: 2655.5 (9%) max: 2845 Points
min: 5779 avg: 6156 median: 6159.5 (21%) max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 635 avg: 1119 median: 1196 (1%) max: 1578 Points
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3137 (2%) max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 189 avg: 329.9 median: 351 (0%) max: 410 Points
min: 825 avg: 832 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9 avg: 3.5 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 4 fps
min: 7 avg: 7.4 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
min: 3.3 avg: 7.4 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.4 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 17 avg: 20.2 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 41 avg: 45.3 median: 46 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 16 avg: 18.5 median: 19 (2%) max: 21 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 26 avg: 32.5 median: 34 (1%) max: 36 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 33 avg: 45.5 median: 46 (3%) max: 68 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55 avg: 88.2 median: 91 (1%) max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 65241 avg: 91752 median: 97328 (12%) max: 106719 Points
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 19.62 avg: 27.1 median: 26.9 (0%) max: 31.27 fps
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363 avg: 1377 median: 1377.5 (0%) max: 1391 Points
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119 avg: 1168 median: 1160 (0%) max: 1231 Points
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (6%) max: 23891 Points
min: 8763 avg: 68002 median: 26723 (9%) max: 291780 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (14%) max: 15659 Points
min: 3274 avg: 20485 median: 22822.5 (38%) max: 28746 Points
42541 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69 avg: 3.7 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 7.31 Watt
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=20 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 243% n=20 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 492% n=20
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 619:
29.7 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, P1:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
29.4 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
21 fps, P1:
22.28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
30 [X] Honor Magic4 Lite 3.2.0.5531
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
60 [X] Sony Xperia 10 V 4.3.0.6993
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
28 fps
29.8 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
15 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
39 fps
45 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
54 ~ 37 fps
Adreno 619:
36 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
47 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
20 fps
28 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
11 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
30 fps
30 ~ 27 fps
200%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 60 [X] Nokia X20 1.59.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia X10 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia XR20 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Nokia X30 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
61 fps
60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
223%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
150%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
103%
Adreno 619:
28 [X] Nokia X20 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
13 fps, max:
31 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, P1:
23.04 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X10 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia XR20 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X30 2.2.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Poco X5 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia XR21 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia G42 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
120%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
130%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 134% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 134%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 152% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 152%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 07:02:00
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731564120s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.003s
#10 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.001s ... 0.004s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.004s
#12 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.005s ... 0.009s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.01s
#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.011s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.032s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.032s
#18 Got 143 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.06s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.06s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.06s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.064s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.064s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.064s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)