Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 612 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 618 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 und 730G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der oberen Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Performance der Adreno 618 sollte leicht oberhalb der Adreno 616 liegen. In unseren Benchmarks sehen wir eine 14 - 30% höhere Performance. Falls die GPU im 730G verbaut wird, ist zusätzlich mit einer 15% höheren Leistung zu rechnen (durch höhere Taktraten).
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 630 Adreno 600 Serie Architektur Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 14 nm 14 nm 10 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 Erscheinungsdatum 15.12.2015 09.04.2019 12.02.2018
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (5%) max: 56640 Points
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1606 avg: 1849 median: 1745 (16%) max: 2285 Points
min: 2845 avg: 3469 median: 3528 (31%) max: 4021 Points
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1427 avg: 1715 median: 1594 (10%) max: 2173 Points
min: 2720 avg: 3552 median: 3610 (22%) max: 4232 Points
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 937 avg: 1108 median: 978 (5%) max: 1480 Points
min: 2192 avg: 2505 median: 2489 (12%) max: 2783 Points
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 823 avg: 952 median: 829 (3%) max: 1286 Points
min: 2008 avg: 2355 median: 2310 (8%) max: 2694 Points
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3037 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (6%) max: 23891 Points
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (4%) max: 27578 Points
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (14%) max: 15659 Points
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=17 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 200% n=17 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 390% n=17
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
150%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
120%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
120%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
148%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 122% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 127%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 123% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 124%
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
v1.28
log 14. 06:52:04
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731563523s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.011s ... 0.013s
#10 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.001s ... 0.014s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0s ... 0.014s
#12 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.023s ... 0.037s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.037s
#14 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.003s ... 0.041s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.071s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.071s
#18 Got 181 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.1s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.1s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.101s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.107s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.107s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.108s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
