Notebookcheck Logo

Amlogic AML8726-MX vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

Amlogic AML8726-MX

Der Amlogic AML8726-M ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones aus 2012. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A9 Kerne (max. 1,5 GHz) mit NEON Erweiterung und eine ARM Mali-400 MP2 Grafikkarte. Auch 1080p Video Dekodierung wird von dem Chip unterstützt.

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelAmlogic AML8726-MXRockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz
Clock1500 MHz1200 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
Technology45 nm55 nm
FeaturesNEON, VFP, Cortex-A9Vivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amlogic.com
iGPUVivante GC800

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 267     avg: 268.5     median: 268.5 (2%)     max: 270 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 958     avg: 963     median: 963 (9%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1409     avg: 1451     median: 1450.5 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 825     avg: 840     median: 839.5 (2%)     max: 854 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1000     avg: 1021     median: 1020.5 (3%)     max: 1041 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 63.9     avg: 86.6     median: 84.2 (3%)     max: 111.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 50.7     avg: 57.9     median: 52.9 (5%)     max: 70.1 MFLOPS
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1243     avg: 1336     median: 1252 (12%)     max: 1513 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3947     avg: 4055     median: 4055 (9%)     max: 4163 points
1249 points (3%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4082     avg: 4886     median: 4886 (32%)     max: 5690 Points

Average Benchmarks Amlogic AML8726-MX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 29% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 14:07:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3611 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732194454s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3611 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 3611 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.014s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.016s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)