Notebookcheck Logo

Amlogic AML8726-MX vs MediaTek MTK 8113L

Amlogic AML8726-MX

► remove from comparison

Der Amlogic AML8726-M ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones aus 2012. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A9 Kerne (max. 1,5 GHz) mit NEON Erweiterung und eine ARM Mali-400 MP2 Grafikkarte. Auch 1080p Video Dekodierung wird von dem Chip unterstützt.

MediaTek MTK 8113L

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MTK 8113L ist ein sehr einfaches SoC für E-Ink-Tablets und E-Reader. Er arbeitet sehr stromsparend, unterstützt aber weder Mobilfunk noch Kamerafunktionen.

Das SoC besitzt einen  ARM-Cortex-A53-Kern mit bis zu 1 GHz Takt.

Als Arbeitsspeicher wird LPDDR4 unterstützt. WiFi 5 und Bluetooth 5.0 sind ebenfalls an Bord. 

Das SoC wird im 12-nm-Verfahren gefertigt.

show full text
ModelAmlogic AML8726-MXMediaTek MTK 8113L
Series Mediatek
Serie: Cortex-A53
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113T compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113L « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1500 MHz1000 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
1 x 1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Technology45 nm12 nm
FeaturesNEON, VFP, Cortex-A9
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amlogic.com
CodenameCortex-A53

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 267     avg: 268.5     median: 268.5 (2%)     max: 270 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 958     avg: 963     median: 963 (9%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1409     avg: 1451     median: 1450.5 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 825     avg: 840     median: 839.5 (2%)     max: 854 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1000     avg: 1021     median: 1020.5 (3%)     max: 1041 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 63.9     avg: 86.6     median: 84.2 (3%)     max: 111.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 50.7     avg: 57.9     median: 52.9 (5%)     max: 70.1 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
27101 ms (32%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1243     avg: 1336     median: 1252 (12%)     max: 1513 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
763 Points (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3947     avg: 4055     median: 4055 (9%)     max: 4163 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4082     avg: 4886     median: 4886 (32%)     max: 5690 Points

Average Benchmarks Amlogic AML8726-MX → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MTK 8113L → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 03:43:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3611 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18027 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731638628s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3611 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 3611 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18027 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 18027 +0.003s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)