Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A18 vs ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

Apple A18

Apple A18

Der Apple A18 ist ein moderner Smartphone-SoC welcher 2024 im iPhone 16 und 16 Plus vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessorteil basiert aus 2 Performance-Kernen mit bis zu 4 GHz und 4 Effizienzkerne. Weiters integriert der SoC 8 GB, eine 35 TOP NPU für AI-Beschleunigung und eine neue 5-Kern GPU. 

Die Performance ist in unseren Benchmarks knapp oberhalb des alten Apple A17 Pro SoCs (iPhone 15 Pro Serie). Wie üblich glänzt der Prozessorteil mit einer hervorragenden Single-Thread-Leistung, welcher deutlich oberhalb der Konkurrenz für Android Smartphones wie dem Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 oder MediaTek Dimensity 9300. In Multi-Thread-Benchmarks verringert sich der Vorsprung zur Konkurrenz deutlich, trotzdem kann hier der aktuelle Spitzenreiter Dimensity 9300 noch knapp geschlagen werden im Geekbench 6.2. Nur der Apple 18 Pro ist durch die größeren Caches noch etwas schneller.

Der Prozessor wird im modernen 3nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt (N3E) und unterstützt das aktuelle ARMv9.2-A Instruktions-Set.

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelApple A18ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz
SeriesApple Apple A-Series
Serie:
Apple A18 Pro compare - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 « - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic compare2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock <=3800 MHz1200 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 6
2 x Apple A18 P-Core
4 x 4.0 GHz Apple A18 E-Core		1 / 1
TDP Turbo PL29 Watt
Technology3 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 2.0 (480 Mbps)
iGPUApple A18 GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 A18 +
min: 3149     avg: 3263     median: 3263 (83%)     max: 3377 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 A18 +
min: 7663     avg: 8013     median: 8012.5 (32%)     max: 8362 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A18 +
2327 Points (91%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A18 +
6130 Points (11%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
12 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A18 +
min: 284.5     avg: 287.4     median: 287.4 (0%)     max: 290.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A18 +
min: 90158     avg: 93106     median: 93106 (78%)     max: 96054 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 A18 +
263 Points (74%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 A18 +
12600 Points (2%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 A18 +
min: 1407     avg: 1450     median: 1449.5 (56%)     max: 1492 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A18 +
min: 3.8     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 4.91 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A18 +
min: 0.693     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.873 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A18 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 11. 02:31:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18007 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731288701s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18007 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 18007 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.019s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.022s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)