Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A18 Pro vs NXP i.MX 6SLL vs Apple S5

Apple A18 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple A18 Pro

the A18 scores 8085, while the A18 Pro earns a score of 8408

NXP i.MX 6SLL

► remove from comparison i.MX 6SLL

Der NXP i.MX 6SLL oder i.MX6SLL (i.MX 6 Series, MCIMX6V7DVN10AB Part Number) ist ein low-End Single-Core-Chip für e-Reader. Er integriert einen einzelnen ARM Cortex-A9 Kern mit bis zu 1 GHz Taktfrequenz und einen Grafikkarte mit 2D Beschleunigung namens Pixel Processor PXP (inkl. E-INK Display Controller EPDC mit bis zu 2332x1650 5 Bit Graustufen-Support). Der integrierte Speichercontroller kann laut NXP mit 400 MHz LPDDR2 und LPDDR3 umgehen (32 Bit Interface). Festspeicher kann durch die drei Verbindungen mit eMMC 5.0 oder SD 3.0 angebunden werden. Ausserdem können 2x USB 2.0 OTG mit PHY nach aussen geführt werden. WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS und Camera Sensoren müssen durch externe Chips angebunden werden.

Der i.MX 6SLL ist Pin-kompatibel mit dem i.MX 6SoloLite.

Apple S5

► remove from comparison Apple S5

Der Apple S5 ist ein 64-Bit-Prozessor mit zwei Kernen der in der Apple Watch Series 5 (40 und 44 mm) eingesetzt wird. Er integriert 32 GB Speicher, Bluetooth 5.0, 1 GB RAM, 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN und Satelliten Positionierung (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS).

show full text
ModelApple A18 ProNXP i.MX 6SLLApple S5
SeriesApple Apple
Serie:
Apple A18 - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 Pro « - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Apple A18 - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 Pro - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 « 2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock <=4000 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads6 / 6
2 x 4.0 GHz Apple A18 P-Core
4 x Apple A18 E-Core		1 / 12 / 2
TDP Turbo PL210 Watt
Technology3 nm40 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps)32-Bit DRAM Controller 400 MHz LPDDR2/LPDDR3, E-INK Display Controller, 2D Graphics Acceleration, eMMC 5.0, USB 2.0 OTG
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB
iGPUNXP PXP
Manufacturerwww.nxp.com

Benchmarks

Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
6771 ms (74%)
335%
1 S5 +
min: 2014     avg: 2022     median: 2022 (22%)     max: 2030 ms
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
5.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks NXP i.MX 6SLL → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Apple S5 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 28. 10:19:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18006 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11524 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11530 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1727511570s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Sep 2024 05:16:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18006 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 18006 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11524 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#11 got single benchmarks 11524 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11530 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 11530 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.013s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.013s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)