Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A15 Bionic vs Intel Core i3-9100F

Apple A15 Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A15

Der Apple A15 Bionic ist System on a Chip (SoC) von Apple, der in der iPhone 13 und iPad Mini 2021 Serie verbaut wird. Er integriert sechs 64-Bit-fähige ARM-Kerne (2 Performance Kerne mit bis zu 3,24 GHz, 4 Stromsparkerne mit bis zu 2,02 GHz). Laut Apple wurde der System Cache verdoppelt und bietet eine schnellere GPU, schnellere Neural Engine. Der Chip ist mit 15.8 Milliarden Transistoren relativ groß.

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

Der Intel Core i3-9100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,2 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i3-9100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i3-8100 konnte die Leistung etwas gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um 10 bis 15 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit auf kleine Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-9100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i3-9100 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

show full text
ModelApple A15 BionicIntel Core i3-9100F
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesIntel Coffee Lake
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Apple A18 Pro compare - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 compare - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic « 2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2020 - 3230 MHz3600 - 4200 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB1 MB
L3 Cache32 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 4
Transistors15800 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set, Machine Learning Controller, 16-Core Neural Engine, Secure Enclave, Advanced Image Signal ProcessorDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUApple A15 GPU 5-Core
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
L1 Cache256 KB
TDP65 Watt
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2
$122 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
27.9 pt (46%)
Intel Core i3-9100F
27.9
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 115%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1852     avg: 2027     median: 1913 (23%)     max: 2307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
2130 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
2332 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
5661 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
A15 +
min: 1590     avg: 1723     median: 1734 (68%)     max: 1755 Points
1152 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
A15 +
min: 4559     avg: 4755     median: 4788 (9%)     max: 4914 Points
4074 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
A15 +
min: 413.6     avg: 455.6     median: 451 (1%)     max: 507.3 ms
866 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A15 +
77 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 57143     avg: 63305     median: 64026.5 (53%)     max: 65969 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 188     avg: 188.3     median: 188 (53%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
A15 +
min: 219     avg: 254.3     median: 250 (46%)     max: 279 Points
204 Points (37%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 722973     avg: 788523     median: 800415 (48%)     max: 832548 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 A15 +
min: 192891     avg: 209810     median: 209802 (57%)     max: 227638 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 A15 +
min: 10349     avg: 10411     median: 10410.5 (1%)     max: 10472 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1132     avg: 1156     median: 1145 (44%)     max: 1190 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (2%)     max: 5.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 0     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.415 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A15 Bionic → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 71% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 03:36:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13825 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731638191s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13825 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 13825 +0.009s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.057s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.059s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)