Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos W920

Apple A15 Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A15

Der Apple A15 Bionic ist System on a Chip (SoC) von Apple, der in der iPhone 13 und iPad Mini 2021 Serie verbaut wird. Er integriert sechs 64-Bit-fähige ARM-Kerne (2 Performance Kerne mit bis zu 3,24 GHz, 4 Stromsparkerne mit bis zu 2,02 GHz). Laut Apple wurde der System Cache verdoppelt und bietet eine schnellere GPU, schnellere Neural Engine. Der Chip ist mit 15.8 Milliarden Transistoren relativ groß.

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

Der Samsung Exynos W920 ist ein Dual-Core ARM SoC für IoT (Internet of Things) Devices aus 2021. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,18 GHz und wird im modernen 5nm Prozess gefertigt. Er integriert eine ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, ein LTE Cat.4 150Mbps Download / Cat.5 75 Mbps Upload Modem und Unterstützung für eMMC 16GB und LPDDR4 12 GB. Videos können mit Full HD und 30fps aufgenommen werden und in HEVC (H.265), H.264 und VP8 en- und dekodiert werden.

ModelApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos W920
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesSamsung
Serie: ARM Cortex-A55
Apple A18 Pro compare - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 compare - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic « 2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Rockchip RK3566 compare - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W930 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W920 « 1.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Clock2020 - 3230 MHz1180 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 62 / 2
Transistors15800 Million
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set, Machine Learning Controller, 16-Core Neural Engine, Secure Enclave, Advanced Image Signal ProcessorMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps video
iGPUApple A15 GPU 5-CoreARM Mali-G68 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameARM Cortex-A55

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1852     avg: 2027     median: 1913 (23%)     max: 2307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
2130 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
2332 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
5661 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1590     avg: 1723     median: 1734 (69%)     max: 1755 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4559     avg: 4755     median: 4788 (9%)     max: 4914 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
A15 +
min: 413.6     avg: 455.6     median: 451 (1%)     max: 507.3 ms
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
A15 +
77 ms (1%)
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
A15 +
min: 57143     avg: 63305     median: 64026.5 (56%)     max: 65969 Points
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 188     avg: 188.3     median: 188 (54%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 219     avg: 254.3     median: 250 (52%)     max: 279 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 722973     avg: 788523     median: 800415 (48%)     max: 832548 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 A15 +
min: 192891     avg: 209810     median: 209802 (57%)     max: 227638 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 A15 +
min: 10349     avg: 10411     median: 10410.5 (1%)     max: 10472 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1132     avg: 1156     median: 1145 (44%)     max: 1190 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (2%)     max: 5.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 0     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.415 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A15 Bionic → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 3% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 06. 10:25:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13825 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728203118s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13825 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 13825 +0.009s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#10 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.004s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.052s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)