Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Apple A15 Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A15

Der Apple A15 Bionic ist System on a Chip (SoC) von Apple, der in der iPhone 13 und iPad Mini 2021 Serie verbaut wird. Er integriert sechs 64-Bit-fähige ARM-Kerne (2 Performance Kerne mit bis zu 3,24 GHz, 4 Stromsparkerne mit bis zu 2,02 GHz). Laut Apple wurde der System Cache verdoppelt und bietet eine schnellere GPU, schnellere Neural Engine. Der Chip ist mit 15.8 Milliarden Transistoren relativ groß.

Samsung Exynos 9610

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9610

Der Samsung Exynos 9610, auch Exynos 7 (9610) genannt, ist ein Mittelklasse-SoC für Android basierende Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A73-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz .

Das integrierte LTE Modem unterstützt 4G mit bis zu 600 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine  Mali-G72 MP3 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan, DirectX 12 und OpenGL ES 3.2. Im Bereich WLAN wird 802.11ac unterstützt sowie Bluetooth 5.0. Der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x.

Dank des modernen 10nm FinFET Herstellungsverfahrens ist der SoC relativ genügsam und wahrscheinlich auch für kleinere Smartphones geeignet.

show full text
ModelApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesSamsung Exynos
Serie: Exynos Exynos 7 Series
Apple A18 Pro compare - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 compare - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic « 2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Samsung Exynos 9611 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 compare1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Clock2020 - 3230 MHz1700 - 2300 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 68 / 8
Transistors15800 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set, Machine Learning Controller, 16-Core Neural Engine, Secure Enclave, Advanced Image Signal Processor
iGPUApple A15 GPU 5-CoreARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameExynos 7 Series
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
14353 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
A15 +
min: 1852     avg: 2027     median: 1913 (18%)     max: 2307 Points
2266 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
A15 +
2130 Points (24%)
2241 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
2332 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
5661 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1590     avg: 1723     median: 1734 (68%)     max: 1755 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4559     avg: 4755     median: 4788 (9%)     max: 4914 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5605 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
A15 +
min: 413.6     avg: 455.6     median: 451 (1%)     max: 507.3 ms
3897 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A15 +
77 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
A15 +
min: 57143     avg: 63305     median: 64026.5 (53%)     max: 65969 Points
10322 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 188     avg: 188.3     median: 188 (53%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
A15 +
min: 219     avg: 254.3     median: 250 (46%)     max: 279 Points
62 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7831 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
36958 Points (45%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
37658 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
61747 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
144194 Points (25%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 722973     avg: 788523     median: 800415 (39%)     max: 832548 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 A15 +
min: 192891     avg: 209810     median: 209802 (52%)     max: 227638 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
A15 +
min: 10349     avg: 10411     median: 10410.5 (1%)     max: 10472 Points
172805 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5827 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7029 Points (35%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1132     avg: 1156     median: 1145 (43%)     max: 1190 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (2%)     max: 5.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 0     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.415 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A15 Bionic → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9610 → 323% n=6

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 08. 06:30:15

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13825 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11346 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736314215s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Jan 2025 05:19:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13825 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 13825 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11346 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 11346 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)