Notebookcheck Logo

AllWinner A13 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 3622

AllWinner A13

 A13

Der AllWinner A13 ist ein sehr günstiger SoC für Handys und Tablets. Verglichen zum schnelleren AllWinner A10, ist der A13 eine abgespeckte und günstigere Version ohne HDMI und SATA Anschlüsse. Er beinhaltet einen mit 1.0 GHz getakteten ARM Cortex A8 Kern (ARMv7), eine ARM Mali 400 (Einzelkern) Grafikkarte und eine Video Einheit mit HD Video Decoder (bis zu 1920x1080 für H.264, H.263, VC1, MPEG1/2/4, XVID, VP6/8, AVS, ...) und Encoder (H.264 High Profile 1920x1080 mit 30 fps).

Er wird noch in 55nm gefertigt und meist mit Linux bzw Android eingesetzt.

Texas Instruments OMAP 3622

► remove from comparison
ModelAllWinner A13Texas Instruments OMAP 3622
CodenameCortex A8Cortex A8
Clock1000 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
Technology55 nm45 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.allwinner.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A13 +
81 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A13 +
623 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A13 +
199 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A13 +
325 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A13 +
316 Points (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 A13 +
12.9 MFLOPS (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A13 +
4034 ms (38%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 A13 +
1996 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 A13 +
834 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks AllWinner A13 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 11:40:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3713 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3328 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732185627s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3713 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 3713 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3328 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 3328 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.015s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)