Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 575 vs Intel Celeron M 520

Intel Celeron M 575

er Intel Celeron M 575 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 520
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 575 « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 « 1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2000 MHz1600 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP31 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage0.95-1.3 V
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesIntel64, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (12%)     max: 1919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (1%)     max: 1919 Points
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (2%)     max: 917 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
74%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (4%)     max: 2039 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 74% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 11:52:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731667927s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 430 +0.005s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 321 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.018s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.02s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)