Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 560 vs Intel Celeron M 550

Intel Celeron M 560

Der Intel Celeron M 560 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 550

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

ModelIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 550
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 560 « 2.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 550 « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2130 MHz2000 MHz
FSB533533
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage0.95V-1.30V V
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (12%)
91%
550 +
1834 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 560 +
2008 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 550 +
877 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 560 +
29.6 s (6%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 550 +
2133 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 550 +
7680 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 550 +
6360 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 550 +
2363 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 550 → 91% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 23. 10:57:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 342 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732355853s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 395 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 342 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 342 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.014s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)