Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 550 vs Intel Celeron M 530 vs Intel Celeron M 570

Intel Celeron M 550

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 530

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 570

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron M 570 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep).

ModelIntel Celeron M 550Intel Celeron M 530Intel Celeron M 570
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 550 « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 « 1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 570 « 2.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2000 MHz1730 MHz2260 MHz
FSB533533533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt30 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 550 +
1834 Points (11%)
88%
1 530 +
1615 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 550 +
877 Points (2%)
84%
1 530 +
739 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 530 +
38 s (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 550 +
2133 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 550 +
7680 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 550 +
6360 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 550 +
2363 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 550 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 530 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 18. 18:18:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 342 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 320 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 396 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734542334s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 05:18:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 342 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 342 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 320 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 320 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 396 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#13 got single benchmarks 396 +0s ... 0.011s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.014s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.014s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)