Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 630 noch in 28 nm gefertigt und bietet ebenfalls einen ARM Cortex-A53 Octa-Core Prozessorteil. Dieser ist jedoch nur mit bis zu 1,4 GHz getaktet. Das Integrierte X9 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 7 und dadurch maximal 300 Mbps Download und 100 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 505 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 mit 800 MHz (daher wahrscheinlich Dual-Channel DDRL-1600). 

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

► remove from comparison Helio P35 MT6765

Der Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 ist ein in Ende 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Octacore für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 8 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne in zwei Clustern. Die vier Kerne im Performance Cluster takten mit bis zu 2,3 GHz, die im Effizienz-Cluster mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Die Die Cores können dank Heterogeneous Multi-Processing bzw. big.LITTLE auch alle gemeinsam genutzt werden. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8320 welche mit 680 MHz getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

show full text
ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 435Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 « 1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1400 MHz1800 - 2300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology28 nm16 nm
FeaturesAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerPowerVR GE8320 680MHz, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505PowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P35 MT6765
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -46%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -39%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -30%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 0%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 24%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 33%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 38%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 39%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (7%)     max: 9345 Points
min: 10689     avg: 15977     median: 17147 (14%)     max: 17853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
min: 766     avg: 1116     median: 1190.5 (14%)     max: 1259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
min: 653     avg: 1096     median: 1190.5 (14%)     max: 1243 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 150     avg: 166.7     median: 168.5 (7%)     max: 173 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 539     avg: 886     median: 934.5 (2%)     max: 1022 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 165     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 176 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 915     avg: 983     median: 1002 (3%)     max: 1031 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
435 +
min: 637     avg: 663     median: 666 (7%)     max: 691 Points
min: 776     avg: 851     median: 855 (9%)     max: 921 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
min: 3834     avg: 4013     median: 3973 (4%)     max: 4232 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
435 +
577 Points (8%)
790 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
435 +
2308 Points (6%)
3542 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3904 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
841 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
888 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2700 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
6455 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3586 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4143 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
min: 9756     avg: 10649     median: 10849 (13%)     max: 11323 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
min: 4347     avg: 4747     median: 4643 (4%)     max: 5543 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
435 +
27 Points (5%)
min: 29     avg: 32     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 36 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
62996 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
7343 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
24869 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
12838 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
40692 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
85742 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 17134     avg: 23682     median: 24259.5 (20%)     max: 29075 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 19601     avg: 26565     median: 26896 (22%)     max: 32868 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 5938     avg: 10313     median: 10175.5 (2%)     max: 14962 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 42692     avg: 45071     median: 45483 (16%)     max: 46624 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 101535     avg: 105631     median: 105734 (10%)     max: 109518 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117053 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
37871 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
min: 2238     avg: 3957     median: 3956.5 (21%)     max: 5675 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
min: 1780     avg: 4353     median: 4353 (9%)     max: 6926 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
min: 3814     avg: 5045     median: 5290 (35%)     max: 5794 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points
min: 4040     avg: 5969     median: 6001 (30%)     max: 7753 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
603 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5059 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.3 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 → 132% n=21

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 18:49:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11371 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731606582s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.015s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11371 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 11371 +0.02s ... 0.044s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.029s ... 0.073s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.078s

#14 return log +0.003s ... 0.081s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)