Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz vs Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz

Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison Samsung 4212 1.5 GHz

Der Samsung Exynos 4 Dual (früher Exynos 4212) ist ein Dual-core Cortex-A9 SoC mit einer ARM Mali-400 MP4 Grafikkarte welche mit 400 MHz getaktet wird. Mit 1.5 GHz Taktrate findet man den 4212 z.B. im Galaxy Note, Galaxy Tab 3 8.0. Im Vergleich zum Exynos 4 Dual 4210 wird der 4212 in 32nm gefertigt (4210 in 40nm) und auch die Grafikkarte ist höher getaktet (400 vs 266 MHz).

Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz

► remove from comparison Samsung 4210 1.4 GHz

Der Samsung Exynos 4 Dual (früher Exynos 4210) ist ein Dual-core Cortex-A9 SoC mit einer ARM Mali-400 MP4 Grafikkarte. Mit 1.4 GHz Taktrate findet man den 4210 z.B. im Galaxy Note, Galaxy Tab 7.7, Meizu MX. 

Die Leistungsdaten der 1.2 GHz Version finden sie auf der Seite des Exynos 4 Dual 4210 1.2 GHz.

show full text
ModelSamsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHzSamsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
SeriesSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
Serie: Exynos Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Clock1500 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Technology32 nm45 nm
FeaturesNEON, Mali 400MP, Memory ControllerNEON, Mali 400MP, Memory Controller
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 5055     avg: 5067     median: 5067 (4%)     max: 5079 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
5262 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 366     avg: 378.5     median: 378.5 (3%)     max: 391 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1059     avg: 1091     median: 1091 (10%)     max: 1123 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1791     avg: 1792     median: 1791.5 (4%)     max: 1792 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1027     avg: 1049     median: 1049 (2%)     max: 1071 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1231     avg: 1241     median: 1240.5 (3%)     max: 1250 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 91.1     avg: 93.5     median: 93.5 (3%)     max: 95.9 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 56.4     avg: 57.4     median: 57.4 (6%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
61.6 MFLOPS (6%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 999     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (12%)     max: 1257 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
917 ms (9%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4616     avg: 4822     median: 4821.5 (11%)     max: 5027 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
3564 Points (23%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 244     avg: 247.5     median: 247.5 (8%)     max: 251 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 5107     avg: 5237     median: 5236.5 (17%)     max: 5366 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 4603     avg: 4815     median: 4814.5 (1%)     max: 5026 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz → 107% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 21. 15:38:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4458 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3056 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734791907s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4458 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 4458 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3056 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 3056 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.019s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.019s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)