Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-3437U vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Core i5-3437U

Der Intel Core i5-3437U ist ein stromsparender ULV-Prozessor basierend auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur. Die mit einem "U" am Ende der Modellbezeichnung gekennzeichnete CPU ist insbesondere für den Einsatz in Ultrabooks vorgesehen. Dank Hyperthreading können die 2 Kerne gleichzeitig bis zu 4 Threads bearbeiten. Die Fertigung erfolgt im Gegensatz zum Vorgänger Sandy Bridge, der noch in 32 Nanometer produziert wurde, in einem kleineren 22 Nanometer Prozess mit 3D-Transistoren. Mit einer Taktrate von 1,9 GHz (maximaler Turbo: 2,7 GHz für 2 Kerne, 2,9 GHz für 1 Kern) befindet sich der i5-3437U knapp unter dem i7-3667U (2,0 GHz), der zudem den größeren L3-Cache (4 MB statt 3 MB) besitzt.

Ivy Bridge ist ein Die Shrink der Sandy Bridge Architektur, der nur an wenigen Stellen verbessert wurde. Unter anderem werden nun PCI Express in der neuen Version 3.0 sowie DDR3(L)-1600 unterstützt. Keine Änderungen gab es beim Featureset, welches weiterhin beispielsweise die Verschlüsselungstechnik AES-NI, die Befehlssatzerweiterung AVX sowie Turbo-Boost 2.0 umfasst.

Die Performance des i5-3437U liegt durch kleinere Verbesserungen der Pro-MHz-Leistung etwa 5 % über einem taktgleichen Modell der Sandy Bridge Architektur. Verglichen mit dem i7-3667U fällt der Prozessor knapp zurück und erreicht im Mittel den i3-3110M mit einer deutlich höheren TDP von 35 Watt. Die Leistungsfähigkeit reicht aus, um auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen wie HD-Videoschnitt oder aktuelle 3D-Spiele befriedigend zu meistern.

Für die Grafikausgabe zeigt sich die im Prozessor integrierte Intel HD Graphics 4000 mit 16 sogenannten Execution Units (EUs) verantwortlich. Mittels Turbo-Modus kann die Ausgangstaktrate von niedrigen 350 MHz bis auf 1200 MHz ansteigen. Die Leistung liegt um etwa 60 % über der des Vorgängers (HD Graphics 3000), womit auch die Grafiklösung von Llano (Radeon HD 6620G als schnellstes Modell) erreicht wird.

Wie die ULV-Modelle der Sandy Bridge Reihe besitzt auch der i5-3437U eine TDP von 17 Watt, die auch die Grafikeinheit beinhaltet. Damit ist die CPU am besten für Ultrabooks oder andere besonders kleine und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i5-3437UIntel Celeron N5095A
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Jasper Lake
CodenameIvy BridgeJasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i5-3380M compare2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3360M compare2.8 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3340M compare2.7 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3320M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3230M compare2.6 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3210M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3437U « 1.9 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3427U compare1.8 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3337U compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3317U compare1.7 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3439Y compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3339Y compare1.5 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1900 - 2900 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache3 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP17 Watt15 Watt
Technology22 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1338
FeaturesHD Graphics 4000 (650-1200MHz), Turbo Boost 2.0, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, AES, Intel 64, Anti-Theft, My WiFi, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitorin, Execute Disable BitDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3437U +
min: 209     avg: 224     median: 224 (1%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3437U +
min: 100     avg: 101     median: 101 (29%)     max: 102 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3437U +
min: 2.66     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (3%)     max: 2.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3437U +
min: 1.19     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (29%)     max: 1.2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 3437U +
min: 3953     avg: 3966     median: 3972 (24%)     max: 3973 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 3437U +
min: 8255     avg: 8268     median: 8269 (6%)     max: 8280 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 3437U +
min: 9939     avg: 10023     median: 9969 (7%)     max: 10160 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 3437U +
min: 4713     avg: 4887     median: 4921 (6%)     max: 5027 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 3437U +
min: 636     avg: 641     median: 642 (8%)     max: 644 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 3437U +
min: 19.96     avg: 20.5     median: 20.4 (4%)     max: 21 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 3437U +
min: 3205     avg: 3362     median: 3361.5 (5%)     max: 3518 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 3437U +
min: 15.07     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (5%)     max: 15.43 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 3437U +
min: 79.7     avg: 80.4     median: 80.4 (19%)     max: 81.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 3437U +
min: 0.139     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.141 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 3437U +
min: 0.233     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.241 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 3437U +
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (3%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 3437U +
min: 3330     avg: 3383     median: 3398 (7%)     max: 3407 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 3437U +
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.8 (3%)     max: 14.13 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 3437U +
min: 30.86     avg: 31.1     median: 31 (1%)     max: 31.52 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 3437U +
min: 702     avg: 716     median: 718 (3%)     max: 727 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 3437U +
54120 MIPS (26%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 3437U +
33100 MFLOPS (25%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 3437U +
min: 8750     avg: 8831     median: 8870 (8%)     max: 8873 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 3437U +
min: 2758     avg: 2962     median: 2977 (8%)     max: 3135 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 3437U +
min: 22743     avg: 27674     median: 27293 (22%)     max: 31645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 3437U +
min: 25548     avg: 25549     median: 25549 (21%)     max: 25550 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 3437U +
min: 2350     avg: 2471     median: 2491 (6%)     max: 2604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 3437U +
min: 2833     avg: 3333     median: 3437.5 (6%)     max: 3622 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 3437U +
min: 4861     avg: 4965     median: 4965 (9%)     max: 5069 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 3437U +
min: 2333     avg: 2395     median: 2395 (47%)     max: 2457 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 3437U +
4545 Points (37%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 3437U +
4570 Points (41%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 3437U +
5903 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 3437U +
5317 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 3437U +
5295 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 3437U +
5434 ms (6%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 3437U +
121.8 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 3437U +
6262 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-3437U → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 13:18:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3626 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728127087s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3626 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 3626 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.03s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)