Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom 330 vs Intel Core Duo T2500 vs Intel Core Duo T2400

Intel Atom 330

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Atom 330 ist eine Dual Core CPU die für Nettops (kleine Desktops) gedacht ist. Daher unterstützt er auch deutlich weniger Stromsparfunktionen als die Einkern Atom Prozessoren für Netbooks (Atom N270, N280).

An Stromsparfunktionen unterstützt der Atom 330 nur den C1 State (N270 z.B. C1, C2, C4, Enhanced Stop Grant, Enhanced Deeper Sleep State, Enhanced Speedstep) und braucht daher ohne Last deutlich mehr als (zwei) Atom N270 brauchen würden. Unter Volllast ist die Leistungsaufnahme ziemlich genau mit zwei N270 vergleichbar.

Die Performance des Dual Core Atom 330 ist zwar deutlich oberhalb eines Atom N270, jedoch noch immer deutlich unterhalb der billgsten Celeron Dual Core oder Athlon Modelle. Die Performance reicht deshalb auch beim 330 nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben (Websurfen, Office, SD Videos z.B.). In Verbindung mit einem ION Chipsatz (wie z.B. im Asus Eee PC Netbook) können einige anspruchslose Spiele und mit der richtigen Software auch HD Videos flüssig dargestellt werden (siehe dazu unseren Testbericht).

Der direkte Nachfolger der Atom 330 CPU ist die Atom D510 mit integriertem Speicherkontroller und GMA 3150 Grafikkarte (wieder nur für Desktops gedacht).

Intel Core Duo T2500

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo T2400

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelIntel Atom 330Intel Core Duo T2500Intel Core Duo T2400
CodenameDiamondvilleYonahYonah
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Atom 330 « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2801.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N2701.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2400 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 MHz2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB533667667
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 22 / 2
TDP8 Watt31 Watt31 Watt
Transistors94 Million
Technology45 nm65 nm65 nm
Voltage0.9V-1.1625V V
Die Size52 mm2
max. Temp.85.2 °C
SocketPBGA437
FeaturesExecute Disable Bit, Hyper-Threading, Intel 64
Architecturex86x86x86
$43 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 330 +
min: 535     avg: 541     median: 542 (3%)     max: 545 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 330 +
min: 1516     avg: 1528     median: 1530 (1%)     max: 1537 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 330 +
min: 2008     avg: 3735     median: 3735 (44%)     max: 5462 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 330 +
min: 62     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (23%)     max: 170.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
330 +
min: 820     avg: 825     median: 824.5 (2%)     max: 829 Points
min: 1593     avg: 1618     median: 1621 (3%)     max: 1639 Points
1488 Points (3%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T2500 +
min: 155     avg: 190.7     median: 200 (77%)     max: 217 Points
97%
1 T2400 +
193 Points (74%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 330 +
min: 92     avg: 97.5     median: 97.5 (21%)     max: 103 s
305%
1 T2400 +
32 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
330 +
209 s (9%)
min: 73     avg: 75.5     median: 75.5 (3%)     max: 78 s
min: 77     avg: 81.7     median: 82 (4%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
330 +
min: 4522     avg: 4575     median: 4574.5 (20%)     max: 4627 s
1761 s (8%)
min: 1834     avg: 1856     median: 1861 (8%)     max: 1867 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
330 +
8030 MIPS (4%)
13519 MIPS (6%)
12390 MIPS (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
330 +
6720 MFLOPS (5%)
9983 MFLOPS (8%)
9150 MFLOPS (7%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T2500 +
545 Points (37%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T2500 +
1719 Points (71%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T2500 +
1551 Points (70%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T2500 +
min: 4992     avg: 5368     median: 5202 (70%)     max: 6075 Points
92%
1 T2400 +
min: 4543     avg: 5011     median: 4800 (65%)     max: 5657 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T2500 +
min: 2859     avg: 3655     median: 3662.5 (8%)     max: 4450 Points
80%
1 T2400 +
min: 2726     avg: 3285     median: 2918 (6%)     max: 4381 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 330 +
3.3 Points (42%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom 330 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2500 → 210% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2400 → 194% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 25. 18:11:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 526 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 170 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735146693s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 526 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 526 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 170 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 170 +0.011s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#13 got single benchmarks 173 +0.014s ... 0.033s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.045s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.045s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)