Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-2467M vs Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-2467M

► remove from comparison Intel 2467M

Der Intel Core i5-2467M ist ein stromsparender ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Mit 1.6 GHz Basistaktfrequenz ist er relativ gering getaktet, jedoch kann er dank Turbo Boost bis zu 2.3 GHz hochtakten (wahrscheinlich 2 Ghz bei Belastung beider Kerne). Durch die Unterstützung von Hyperthreading können 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden. Im Vergleich zu den i7 CPUs, fehlt dem i5-2467M die VT-d, Trusted Execution und vPro Funktionen.

Sandy Bridge ist eine Weiterentwicklung der Arrandale Architektur. Neben Optimierungen sind besonders die neuen 256 Bit AVX Instruktionen im CPU Teil und der verbesserte Turbo 2.0 erwähnenswert. Weiters sind nun ebenfalls AES Funktionen und ein verbesserter Dual Channel DDR3 Speicherkontroller für max. 8 GB DDR3-1333MHz direkt im Prozessor integriert.

Die intergrierte DirectX 10 fähige Intel HD Graphics 3000 Grafikkarte ist direkt in der CPU untergebracht und teilt sich mit dieser den Level 3 / Last Level Cache. Dadurch sinkt zwar die Prozessorleistung etwas bei aktivierter Grafik, die Grafikleistung ist jedoch deutlich besser als bei der alten Intel HD Graphics in ULV Notebooks. Vergleichen mit den stärkeren 35 Watt Doppelkernprozessoren ist die Grafikleistung jedoch aufgrund der geringeren Taktfrequenz deutlich schlechter (350 versus 650 MHz Basistakt, 1150 versus 1100-1300 MHz Turbo Boost).

Die Performance liegt dank der verbesserten Architektur und des überarbeiteten Turbo Boost etwas oberhalb einer ähnlich getakteten Arrandale CPU. Bei ausreichender Kühlung erreicht er dadurch sogar bessere Benchmarkwerte als der ältere Core i3-350M mit 2.26GHz (siehe Benchmarks weiter unten).

Die Sandy Bridge Doppelkernprozessoren beinhalten im angegebenen TDP von 17 Watt auch die Grafikkarte und den Speicherkontroller. Durch den Turbo Boost 2.0 wird der TDP jedoch unter Last eher ausgenutzt. Mit 17W TDP eignet sich der Prozessor auch für kleine und leichte Notebooks.

Intel Core i5-2410M

► remove from comparison Intel 2410M

The Intel Core i5-2410M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q1 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.3 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.6 GHz (2 cores active) and 2.9 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2410M does not support AES, VT-d, and Trusted Execution functions.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core.

The i5-2410M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2410M it is clocked from 650-1200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2410M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2410M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

ModelIntel Core i5-2467MIntel Core i5-2410M
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Serie: Core i5 Sandy Bridge
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2450M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2410M2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2467M « 1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2450M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2410M « 2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2467M1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2300 MHz2300 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million624 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size149 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023rPGA988B / BGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics 3000 (350-1150MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 3000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 16GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$250 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.52     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.94 Points
min: 2.19     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.61 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2776     avg: 2855     median: 2848 (17%)     max: 2922 Points
min: 3066     avg: 3642     median: 3663 (22%)     max: 3733 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4707     avg: 5737     median: 5921 (4%)     max: 5970 Points
min: 6005     avg: 7880     median: 7962.5 (6%)     max: 8116 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6138     avg: 6961     median: 7074 (5%)     max: 7306 Points
min: 7559     avg: 9451     median: 9618 (6%)     max: 9840 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3355     avg: 3535     median: 3548.5 (4%)     max: 3634 Points
min: 3093     avg: 4482     median: 4545 (6%)     max: 4670 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 804     avg: 889     median: 870 (10%)     max: 1052 s
min: 584     avg: 627     median: 591.5 (7%)     max: 838 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 25     avg: 27     median: 27.2 (5%)     max: 27.72 s
min: 18.3     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (4%)     max: 26.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2410M +
2382 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2410M +
14.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2410M +
76.3 fps (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2410M +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2410M +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2410M +
1.3 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1949     avg: 2316     median: 2414 (5%)     max: 2441 Points
min: 2702     avg: 3198     median: 3219 (7%)     max: 3271 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17     avg: 18.3     median: 17.6 (4%)     max: 24 s
min: 12     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (3%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 38     avg: 41.3     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 54 s
min: 30     avg: 32.4     median: 32 (1%)     max: 47 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 895     avg: 970     median: 934 (4%)     max: 1237 s
min: 717     avg: 760     median: 743.5 (3%)     max: 1298 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 27000     avg: 33363     median: 33725 (16%)     max: 39000 MIPS
53120 MIPS (25%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 18900     avg: 22583     median: 23650 (18%)     max: 24130 MFLOPS
32000 MFLOPS (25%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 2410M +
min: 7191     avg: 7287     median: 7287 (15%)     max: 7383 Points
min: 3.4     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5115     avg: 6127     median: 6303.5 (5%)     max: 6549 Points
min: 5000     avg: 8505     median: 8680 (7%)     max: 8974 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2652     avg: 2667     median: 2666.5 (7%)     max: 2681 Points
min: 1501     avg: 3173     median: 3211 (8%)     max: 3657 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2467M → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2410M → 132% n=16

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 18:24:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2740 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1572 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731605065s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2740 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 2740 +0.024s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1572 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#10 got single benchmarks 1572 +0.08s ... 0.11s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.132s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.135s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)