In the following briefly we will list all grafic cards for Notebooks, which are available at the market. Additionally we represent approximate values of different bench marks (3D Mark at the moment) in italic style beneath the display adapters.

Please read this text in our new English section of Notebookcheck International.

Performance class 1
They can be compared with current high end Desktop video cards of the impact of a X800 and 6800. The cards contain a similar core, however usually they are minor clocked and therefore somewhat more slowly. The newest games should run fluently with all details.

• MOBILITY RADEON X800XT
  16 pixels -, 6 vertexpipelines, 256 bit memory, PixelShader 2.0, code name M28Pro
  about? / 11000/5000 3DMark 01/03/05
   
• MOBILITY RADEON X800
  12 pixels -, 6 vertexpipelines, 128/256 bit memory, PixelShader 2.0, code name M28,  bench mark: gamespot.com, anandtech.com
  about 19100/8600 3DMark 01/03 (256 bits)
   
• MOBILITY FireGL V5000
  CAD version of the X800 (the usage of professional drivers is possible)
   
• Geforce Go 6800 Ultra
  12 pixels -, 5 vertexpipelines, 256 bit, high-clocked Geforce Go 6800, bench mark: anandtech.com, tomshardware.com
  about 23800/11000 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce Go 6800
  12 pixels -, 5 vertexpipelines, 128/256 bit, benchmark: gamespot.com, anandtech.com, tomshardware.com
  about 20000/9500 3DMark 01/03 (256 bits)
   
• Quadro FX Go 1400
  CAD version 6800 Go (the usage of professional drivers is possible)
   
• Mobility Radeon 9800
  8 pixels -, 4 vertexpipelines, 256 bit, benchmark: Hardwareluxx.de, tomshardware.de,
  tomshardware.com
  about 17800/6500 3DMark 01/03
  

• MOBILITY RADEON X700
  8 pixels -, 6 vertexpipelines, 128 bit memory bus, code name M26, benchmark: hothardware.com, hardwareluxx.de
  about 16500/5700 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce Go 6600
  8 pixels -, 4 vertexpipelines, 128 bits, benchmark: notebookcheck.com
  about 15000/5800 3DMark 01/03
  

Performance class 3
Here is the 9700 of special interest, however it is not comparable with the 9700 for Desktop, because ist contains the core of the series 9600 (XT). This class is still quite capably to present newest games fluently, but not with all details.

• MOBILITY RADEON 9700
  4 pixels -, 2 vertexpipelines, based on 9600, 128 bits memory bus, code name M11, benchmark: tomshardware.de, tomshardware.com
  about 10600  / 3000 3DMark 01/03
   
•  MOBILITY RADEON X600
  4 pixels -, 2 vertexpipelines, 128 bits, 9700 with PCI e, PowerPlay 5,0 and VPU Recover II, benchmark:  notebookcheck.com, notebookreview.com
  about 10000/3000 3DMark 01/03
   
• MOBILITY FireGL V3200
  CAD version of the X600, PCI e
   
• MOBILITY FireGL T2e
  CAD version of the Mobility Radeon 9700, 128 bits
   
• Geforce4 4200 Go
  128 bits, slower clocked desktop Geforce Ti 4200
  about 9500 /? 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce FX Go 5700
  128 bits
  about 11000/2700 3DMark 01/03
   
• Quadro FX Go 1000
  128 bits

• MOBILITY RADEON X300
  4 pixels -, 2 vertexpipelines, 64 bits memory bus, bench mark: hardwarezone.com, Notebook Foren.de
  about 7000/1900 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce Go 6200
  4 pixels -, 3 vertexpipelines, with own memory
  about 8800/2300 3DMark 01/03
   
• MOBILITY RADEON 9600
  4 pixels -, 2 vertexpipelines, 64/128 bit, code name M10, bench mark: tomshardware.de
  about 9200/2500 3DMark 01/03 (128 bits)
   
•  MOBILITY FireGL T2
  CAD version of the Mobility Radeon 9600, 128 bits
   
• Geforce FX Go 5650/5600
  128 bits, bench mark: tomshardware.de, tomshardware.com
  about 9000  / 1900 3DMark 01/03
  

Performance class 5
These grafic processors can show only older games fluently. Current games can only be presented with substantially reduced details.

• Geforce4 460 Go
  about 5500/260 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce4 440 Go
  about 5000 /? 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce4 420 Go
  about 4300 /? 3DMark 01/03
   
• Geforce FX Go 5200/5100
  about 6800/1100 3DMark 01/03 (128 bits)
   
• MOBILITY RADEON 9200
  64/128 bits
  about 6700/1000 3DMark 01/03 (128 bits)
   
• MOBILITY RADEON 9000
  64/128 bits
  about 6700/1000 3DMark 01/03 (128 bits)
   
• MOBILITY FireGL 9000
  128 bits, code name M9
   
• MOBILITY RADEON 7500
   
• MOBILITY FireGL 7800
   
• Intel Graphics Media accelerator (GMA) 900
  333 MHz core, 4 pixel pipelines, Shared MEMORY, Direct X 9 hardware support, benchmark: Notebookcheck.com (MSI S260), comparably with mobile Radeon 9000 (64Bit)
  about 4000/900 3DMark 01/03
   
• XGI VOLARI-XP5 SE
  128 bits, DirectX 8.1
  about 2100/300 3DMark 01/03  

• Geforce 2 Go (Geforce 2 Go 200/100)
  64/128 bit, 16-64 MB video RAM, hardware Transform & Lighting
  about 2500/130 3DMark 01/03
   
• MOBILITY RADEON
  No hardware Transform & Lighting (T&L) 
   
• MOBILITY RADEON 9100 IGP
  Onboard grafics solution
  about 1600/90 3D Marks of 01/03
  
  
• MOBILITY RADEON 9000 IGP
  Onboard grafics solution, benchmark: chip.de
  about? / 500 3D Marks of 01/03
  
  
• MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
  Onboard grafics solution
  
  
• Intel Extreme Graphics 2 (855 GME chipset)
  Onboard grafics solution for laptops, which are based on Centrino technology, Shared MEMORY, code name Montara
   
• VIA S3G UniChrome
  Onboard grafics solution, VIA PM800-880
   
• S3 Graphics ProSavage8
  Onboard grafics solution, inserted in the chipset VIA KN266 for Athlon processors and in PN266 for Intel Pentium 4 processors 
   
• SIS M661FX (SIS Mirage)
  Onboard grafics solution in SIS chipset
  about 1300 3D Mark of 01
  
  
• VIA Castle Rock
  Onboard grafics solution in VIA CLE266, AGP 4x, 128 bits 2D, 64 bits 3D, alpha Blending
  1 pixel -, 2 texture pipelines